Improving the causal treatment effect estimation with propensity scores by the bootstrap

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maeregu W. Arisido, Fulvia Mecatti, Paola Rebora
{"title":"Improving the causal treatment effect estimation with propensity scores by the bootstrap","authors":"Maeregu W. Arisido,&nbsp;Fulvia Mecatti,&nbsp;Paola Rebora","doi":"10.1007/s10182-021-00427-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When observational studies are used to establish the causal effects of treatments, the estimated effect is affected by treatment selection bias. The inverse propensity score weight (IPSW) is often used to deal with such bias. However, IPSW requires strong assumptions whose misspecifications and strategies to correct the misspecifications were rarely studied. We present a bootstrap bias correction of IPSW (BC-IPSW) to improve the performance of propensity score in dealing with treatment selection bias in the presence of failure to the ignorability and overlap assumptions. The approach was motivated by a real observational study to explore the potential of anticoagulant treatment for reducing mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. The benefit of the treatment to enhance survival was demonstrated; the suggested BC-IPSW method indicated a statistically significant reduction in mortality for patients receiving the treatment. Using extensive simulations, we show that BC-IPSW substantially reduced the bias due to the misspecification of the ignorability and overlap assumptions. Further, we showed that IPSW is still useful to account for the lack of treatment randomization, but its advantages are stringently linked to the satisfaction of ignorability, indicating that the existence of relevant though unmeasured or unused covariates can worsen the selection bias.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10182-021-00427-3.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10182-021-00427-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When observational studies are used to establish the causal effects of treatments, the estimated effect is affected by treatment selection bias. The inverse propensity score weight (IPSW) is often used to deal with such bias. However, IPSW requires strong assumptions whose misspecifications and strategies to correct the misspecifications were rarely studied. We present a bootstrap bias correction of IPSW (BC-IPSW) to improve the performance of propensity score in dealing with treatment selection bias in the presence of failure to the ignorability and overlap assumptions. The approach was motivated by a real observational study to explore the potential of anticoagulant treatment for reducing mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease. The benefit of the treatment to enhance survival was demonstrated; the suggested BC-IPSW method indicated a statistically significant reduction in mortality for patients receiving the treatment. Using extensive simulations, we show that BC-IPSW substantially reduced the bias due to the misspecification of the ignorability and overlap assumptions. Further, we showed that IPSW is still useful to account for the lack of treatment randomization, but its advantages are stringently linked to the satisfaction of ignorability, indicating that the existence of relevant though unmeasured or unused covariates can worsen the selection bias.

利用bootstrap改进倾向评分的因果治疗效果估计
当观察性研究用于确定治疗的因果效应时,估计的效果受到治疗选择偏倚的影响。逆倾向得分权重(IPSW)通常用于处理这种偏差。然而,IPSW需要强有力的假设,其错误规范和纠正错误规范的策略很少被研究。我们提出了IPSW的自举偏差校正(BC-IPSW),以改善倾向评分在处理可忽略性和重叠假设失败的治疗选择偏差时的表现。该方法的动机是一项真实的观察性研究,旨在探索抗凝治疗降低终末期肾病患者死亡率的潜力。证明了治疗对提高生存率的益处;建议的BC-IPSW方法表明,接受治疗的患者死亡率有统计学意义的降低。通过广泛的模拟,我们发现BC-IPSW大大减少了由于可忽略性和重叠假设的错误说明而导致的偏差。此外,我们发现IPSW仍然有助于解释治疗随机化的缺乏,但其优势与可忽略性的满意度密切相关,这表明相关但未测量或未使用的协变量的存在会恶化选择偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信