Mid-Term Effectiveness of Ozone (O2-O3) Compared to Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial

Q4 Medicine
M. E. Fernández-Cuadros, O. Pérez-Moro, M. Albaladejo-Florín, Beatriz Entrambasaguas-Estepa, S. Álava-Rabasa
{"title":"Mid-Term Effectiveness of Ozone (O2-O3) Compared to Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial","authors":"M. E. Fernández-Cuadros, O. Pérez-Moro, M. Albaladejo-Florín, Beatriz Entrambasaguas-Estepa, S. Álava-Rabasa","doi":"10.5812/MEJRH.74140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: A randomized parallel controlled trial was designed to compare efficacy of ozone (O 2 -O 3 ) against platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as intra-articular infiltrations in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Methods: Tertiary-level outpatient rehabilitation service. Subjects: Fifty-four patients with knee OA grades 2 a - 4 a according to Kellgren-Lawrencescalewereincludedafterobtaininganinformedconsent. Thetargetsamplesizewas27patientspergroup. Inter-vention: Patientsreceivedfourozone(interventiongroup)orthreeplatelet-richplasma(controlgroup)intra-articularinfiltrations at a one-week interval. Outcome measures: Patients were clinically and functionally evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS pain) and by Western Ontario and Mac Master index for osteoarthritis (WOMAC) at baseline and at two months follow-up. Pain, stiffness, function, and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated outcome variables. Results: Overall,27patientswererandomlyallocatedtotheinterventiongroup(ozone)and27tothecontrolgroup(PRP).Improve-mentinpain,function,andQoLwereobservedinbothgroupswithoutastatisticaldifference(P> 0.05). Stiffnessimprovementwas significant between similar and different treatment groups (P < 0.05). No side-effects were observed in either group. Conclusions: Ozone (O 2 -O 3 ) is as effective as PRP in the management of knee OA. Both interventions improved pain, function, and QoL with no statistical difference between them.","PeriodicalId":36354,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MEJRH.74140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: A randomized parallel controlled trial was designed to compare efficacy of ozone (O 2 -O 3 ) against platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as intra-articular infiltrations in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Methods: Tertiary-level outpatient rehabilitation service. Subjects: Fifty-four patients with knee OA grades 2 a - 4 a according to Kellgren-Lawrencescalewereincludedafterobtaininganinformedconsent. Thetargetsamplesizewas27patientspergroup. Inter-vention: Patientsreceivedfourozone(interventiongroup)orthreeplatelet-richplasma(controlgroup)intra-articularinfiltrations at a one-week interval. Outcome measures: Patients were clinically and functionally evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS pain) and by Western Ontario and Mac Master index for osteoarthritis (WOMAC) at baseline and at two months follow-up. Pain, stiffness, function, and quality of life (QoL) were evaluated outcome variables. Results: Overall,27patientswererandomlyallocatedtotheinterventiongroup(ozone)and27tothecontrolgroup(PRP).Improve-mentinpain,function,andQoLwereobservedinbothgroupswithoutastatisticaldifference(P> 0.05). Stiffnessimprovementwas significant between similar and different treatment groups (P < 0.05). No side-effects were observed in either group. Conclusions: Ozone (O 2 -O 3 ) is as effective as PRP in the management of knee OA. Both interventions improved pain, function, and QoL with no statistical difference between them.
臭氧(O2-O3)与富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗膝关节骨关节炎的中期疗效比较:一项随机平行对照试验
目的:设计了一项随机平行对照试验,比较臭氧(O2-O3)与富含血小板血浆(PRP)在膝骨关节炎(OA)患者关节内的渗透效率。方法:三级门诊康复服务。受试者:根据凯尔格伦定律,54名膝关节骨性关节炎2 a-4 a级患者包括在获得知情同意后。目标样本量为每组27名患者。干预:患者每隔一周接受一次臭氧(干预组)或富血浆三氟哌甲酯(对照组)关节内渗透。结果测量:在基线和两个月的随访中,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS疼痛)、西安大略和Mac骨关节炎Master指数(WOMAC)对患者进行临床和功能评估。疼痛、疲劳、功能和生活质量(QoL)是评估结果变量。结果:27例患者随机分为干预组(臭氧组)和对照组(PRP)。两组患者的记忆力、功能和生活质量均有改善,但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。相似和不同治疗组的疗效有显著改善(P<0.05)。两组均未观察到副作用。结论:臭氧(O2-O3)在膝关节骨性关节炎的治疗中与PRP一样有效。两种干预措施都改善了疼痛、功能和生活质量,但没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信