Investigating how composing teaching and assessment in English secondary school classrooms reinforce myths about composers and their creative practices

IF 1 3区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kirsty Devaney
{"title":"Investigating how composing teaching and assessment in English secondary school classrooms reinforce myths about composers and their creative practices","authors":"Kirsty Devaney","doi":"10.1017/S0265051722000134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although composing has been a significant part of formal classroom music education in England for over 30 years, there still remains uncertainty about how to teach and assess composing in secondary schools. This research investigates the under-researched area of teaching and learning of composing in upper secondary schools in England whereby students (aged 14–18) may opt to study music for a national qualification. Taking a mixed methodology approach, data were collected through a survey of 182 music teachers, interviews with five prominent composer-educators, as well as research with five case study schools involving observations of teaching and interviews with teachers and students. This paper reports on three prominent beliefs about composers that seem to underpin teaching and assessment practices; firstly that composers have innate musical talents; secondly that composing is solely an individual process and finally that students must learn the ‘rules’ of composing before being creative. This article proposes that these perceptions do not reflect the diversity of composers’ creative practices and may result in reinforcing stereotypes and myths about composers that have the potential to disadvantage certain students in the examination.","PeriodicalId":54192,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Music Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051722000134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Although composing has been a significant part of formal classroom music education in England for over 30 years, there still remains uncertainty about how to teach and assess composing in secondary schools. This research investigates the under-researched area of teaching and learning of composing in upper secondary schools in England whereby students (aged 14–18) may opt to study music for a national qualification. Taking a mixed methodology approach, data were collected through a survey of 182 music teachers, interviews with five prominent composer-educators, as well as research with five case study schools involving observations of teaching and interviews with teachers and students. This paper reports on three prominent beliefs about composers that seem to underpin teaching and assessment practices; firstly that composers have innate musical talents; secondly that composing is solely an individual process and finally that students must learn the ‘rules’ of composing before being creative. This article proposes that these perceptions do not reflect the diversity of composers’ creative practices and may result in reinforcing stereotypes and myths about composers that have the potential to disadvantage certain students in the examination.
调查英国中学课堂上的作曲教学和评估如何强化了对作曲家及其创作实践的误解
30多年来,作曲一直是英国正规课堂音乐教育的重要组成部分,但在中学如何教授和评估作曲仍然存在不确定性。本研究调查了英国高中作曲教学研究不足的领域,学生(14-18岁)可以选择学习音乐以获得国家资格。采用混合方法,通过对182名音乐教师的调查、对5名杰出作曲家教育家的访谈、对5所案例研究学校的研究(包括对教学的观察和对教师和学生的访谈)收集数据。本文报告了关于作曲家的三个突出信念,这些信念似乎是教学和评估实践的基础;首先,作曲家具有天生的音乐天赋;其次,作曲完全是一个个人的过程,最后,学生必须学习作曲的“规则”,然后才有创造力。这篇文章提出,这些看法并没有反映出作曲家创作实践的多样性,并可能导致强化对作曲家的刻板印象和神话,这可能会使某些学生在考试中处于不利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信