Feedback and year level effects on university students’ self-efficacy and emotions during self-assessment: positive impact of rubrics vs. instructor feedback
E. Panadero, Daniel García-Pérez, Javier Fernández Ruiz, J. Fraile, Iván Sánchez-Iglesias, Gavin T. L. Brown
{"title":"Feedback and year level effects on university students’ self-efficacy and emotions during self-assessment: positive impact of rubrics vs. instructor feedback","authors":"E. Panadero, Daniel García-Pérez, Javier Fernández Ruiz, J. Fraile, Iván Sánchez-Iglesias, Gavin T. L. Brown","doi":"10.1080/01443410.2023.2254015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explored the effects of three factors (feedback occasion, type of feedback, and year level) on self-efficacy and emotions when university students self-assessed. 126 higher education students from three different year levels self-assessed their performance on a writing task two times (before and after receiving feedback). Self-efficacy and emotions were measured via self-report at three times (a baseline before self-assessment, after self-assessment without feedback, and after self-assessment with feedback). Feedback was provided in one of three conditions (rubric vs. instructor’s feedback vs. combined) to which the participants were randomly assigned. In general, rubric feedback showed the strongest effects on self-efficacy and emotions (i.e. increased positive and decreased negative emotions). Year level was significant for self-efficacy, showing that the effect of university schooling experience enhances this variable. This study shows the impact that feedback has on self-efficacy and emotions while self-assessing, with an especially positive effect for rubric feedback.","PeriodicalId":48053,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"756 - 779"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2254015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This study explored the effects of three factors (feedback occasion, type of feedback, and year level) on self-efficacy and emotions when university students self-assessed. 126 higher education students from three different year levels self-assessed their performance on a writing task two times (before and after receiving feedback). Self-efficacy and emotions were measured via self-report at three times (a baseline before self-assessment, after self-assessment without feedback, and after self-assessment with feedback). Feedback was provided in one of three conditions (rubric vs. instructor’s feedback vs. combined) to which the participants were randomly assigned. In general, rubric feedback showed the strongest effects on self-efficacy and emotions (i.e. increased positive and decreased negative emotions). Year level was significant for self-efficacy, showing that the effect of university schooling experience enhances this variable. This study shows the impact that feedback has on self-efficacy and emotions while self-assessing, with an especially positive effect for rubric feedback.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides an international forum for the discussion and rapid dissemination of research findings in psychology relevant to education. The journal places particular emphasis on the publishing of papers reporting applied research based on experimental and behavioural studies. Reviews of relevant areas of literature also appear from time to time. The aim of the journal is to be a primary source for articles dealing with the psychological aspects of education ranging from pre-school to tertiary provision and the education of children with special needs. The prompt publication of high-quality articles is the journal"s first priority. All contributions are submitted "blind" to at least two independent referees before acceptance for publication.