Acknowledgment of Adat Law-Based Tenure in the Courtroom: Study of Decisions on Criminal Acts of Land Clearing by Burning, Logging Trees Without Permits, and Collecting Plantation Products Without Permits

Almonika Cindy Fatika Sari
{"title":"Acknowledgment of Adat Law-Based Tenure in the Courtroom: Study of Decisions on Criminal Acts of Land Clearing by Burning, Logging Trees Without Permits, and Collecting Plantation Products Without Permits","authors":"Almonika Cindy Fatika Sari","doi":"10.31292/bhumi.v8i2.513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The recognition of the existence of adat communities and their rights can not only be found in the constitution but also various regional laws and regulations. However, this recognition is counterproductive because it further distances adat communities from their rights, especially tenure rights based on adat law. The diverse and minimal understanding of adat law by executives and law enforcement officials compound this condition. Sometimes, adat communities must face the law because they are suspected of committing criminal acts violating it. Therefore, this research aimed to examine the recognition of adat communities’ tenure rights in the courtroom. This research is normative legal research using a case approach—four court decisions as the primary data. The results of this study indicated that in deciding cases, there are times when judges recognize how adat communities control and utilize natural resources according to their adat law. However, there are times when judges override the narrative of adat law that adat communities claim. This research also showed that adat law narratives can play a role in freeing adat communities from punishment.\nKeywords: Adat law, adat communities, criminal crime, tenure rights","PeriodicalId":32710,"journal":{"name":"BHUMI Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BHUMI Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v8i2.513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The recognition of the existence of adat communities and their rights can not only be found in the constitution but also various regional laws and regulations. However, this recognition is counterproductive because it further distances adat communities from their rights, especially tenure rights based on adat law. The diverse and minimal understanding of adat law by executives and law enforcement officials compound this condition. Sometimes, adat communities must face the law because they are suspected of committing criminal acts violating it. Therefore, this research aimed to examine the recognition of adat communities’ tenure rights in the courtroom. This research is normative legal research using a case approach—four court decisions as the primary data. The results of this study indicated that in deciding cases, there are times when judges recognize how adat communities control and utilize natural resources according to their adat law. However, there are times when judges override the narrative of adat law that adat communities claim. This research also showed that adat law narratives can play a role in freeing adat communities from punishment. Keywords: Adat law, adat communities, criminal crime, tenure rights
法庭承认阿达特法律效力——关于焚烧土地、无证伐木、无证收集种植产品犯罪行为的判决研究
摘要:承认土著社区的存在及其权利不仅体现在宪法中,也体现在各种地区法律法规中。然而,这种承认会适得其反,因为它进一步疏远了阿达特社区的权利,尤其是基于阿达特法律的保有权。行政人员和执法官员对adat法律的不同和最低限度的理解加剧了这种情况。有时,阿达特社区因为涉嫌实施违反法律的犯罪行为而必须面对法律。因此,本研究旨在检验阿达特社区在法庭上的保有权是否得到承认。这项研究是一项规范性的法律研究,采用案例法——四项法院判决作为主要数据。这项研究的结果表明,在裁决案件时,法官有时会认识到阿达特社区如何根据其阿达特法控制和利用自然资源。然而,有时法官会推翻阿达特社区所声称的阿达特法律的叙述。这项研究还表明,阿达特法律叙事可以在将阿达特社区从惩罚中解放出来方面发挥作用。关键词:阿达特法、阿达特社区、刑事犯罪、保有权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信