Advancing Lumbar Surgery: Exploring the Efficacy and Outcomes of Spinal Anesthesia in 41 Cases.

Aurangzeb Kalhoro, A. Hashim
{"title":"Advancing Lumbar Surgery: Exploring the Efficacy and Outcomes of Spinal Anesthesia in 41 Cases.","authors":"Aurangzeb Kalhoro, A. Hashim","doi":"10.29052/ijehsr.v11.i2.2023.90-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spinal anesthesia has emerged as a safe and effective alternative for patients with lumbar spine degenerative disease, particularly those with comorbidities. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of spinal anesthesia in the management of lumbar disc degeneration at the Neurospinal and Cancer Care Institute in Karachi. \nMethodology: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Neurospinal and Cancer Care Institute's Department of Neurosurgery. The study included patients with a mean age of 53.43 ± 8.11 years and was carried out from February 2019 to August 2022, following approval from the Institutional Review Board. \nResults: The study comprised predominantly high-risk patients, with 32 individuals (78%) having associated comorbidities. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was used to assess the patients' risk level, with 3 patients (7.31%) classified as ASA grade I, 21 patients (51.21%) as ASA grade II, 16 patients (39.02%) as ASA grade III, and 2 patients (4.87%) as ASA grade IV. The most commonly affected level of disc degeneration was L4-L5 (63.41%), followed by L5-S1 (36.58%), with the majority of stenosis occurring at L4-S1. No complications such as urinary retention, vomiting, or dural tear were observed. Pain relief was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), with 23 patients having a preoperative VAS score of 7, 14 patients with a score of 8, and 4 patients with a score of 9. Postoperatively, 18 patients (43.9%) had a VAS score of 2, 23 patients (56%) had a score of 1, and 5 patients (12%) had a score of 0. \nConclusion: Based on the findings of this study, spinal anesthesia can be considered a suitable alternative to general anesthesia for patients with comorbidities or those classified as ASA grade I/II. This technique offers several advantages, including cost-effectiveness, shorter anesthesia duration, and fewer complications. These findings support the use of spinal anesthesia in patients with limited spinal pathology in the lumbar spine.","PeriodicalId":34196,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29052/ijehsr.v11.i2.2023.90-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia has emerged as a safe and effective alternative for patients with lumbar spine degenerative disease, particularly those with comorbidities. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of spinal anesthesia in the management of lumbar disc degeneration at the Neurospinal and Cancer Care Institute in Karachi. Methodology: This prospective cohort study was conducted at the Neurospinal and Cancer Care Institute's Department of Neurosurgery. The study included patients with a mean age of 53.43 ± 8.11 years and was carried out from February 2019 to August 2022, following approval from the Institutional Review Board. Results: The study comprised predominantly high-risk patients, with 32 individuals (78%) having associated comorbidities. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was used to assess the patients' risk level, with 3 patients (7.31%) classified as ASA grade I, 21 patients (51.21%) as ASA grade II, 16 patients (39.02%) as ASA grade III, and 2 patients (4.87%) as ASA grade IV. The most commonly affected level of disc degeneration was L4-L5 (63.41%), followed by L5-S1 (36.58%), with the majority of stenosis occurring at L4-S1. No complications such as urinary retention, vomiting, or dural tear were observed. Pain relief was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), with 23 patients having a preoperative VAS score of 7, 14 patients with a score of 8, and 4 patients with a score of 9. Postoperatively, 18 patients (43.9%) had a VAS score of 2, 23 patients (56%) had a score of 1, and 5 patients (12%) had a score of 0. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, spinal anesthesia can be considered a suitable alternative to general anesthesia for patients with comorbidities or those classified as ASA grade I/II. This technique offers several advantages, including cost-effectiveness, shorter anesthesia duration, and fewer complications. These findings support the use of spinal anesthesia in patients with limited spinal pathology in the lumbar spine.
推进腰椎外科手术:探索41例腰麻的疗效和结果。
背景:对于腰椎退行性疾病患者,尤其是合并症患者,脊柱麻醉已成为一种安全有效的替代方法。本研究的目的是在卡拉奇神经脊髓和癌症护理研究所研究脊柱麻醉在腰椎间盘退变治疗中的作用。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究在神经脊髓和癌症护理研究所神经外科进行。该研究包括平均年龄为53.43±8.11岁的患者,在获得机构审查委员会批准后,于2019年2月至2022年8月进行。结果:该研究主要包括高危患者,其中32人(78%)有相关合并症。使用美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分类来评估患者的风险水平,其中3名患者(7.31%)被归类为ASA I级,21名患者(51.21%)被归类于ASA II级,16名患者(39.02%)被归类到ASA III级,2名患者(4.87%)被归类在ASA IV级。椎间盘退变最常见的影响程度是L4-L5(63.41%),其次是L5-S1(36.58%),其中大部分狭窄发生在L4-S1。未观察到尿潴留、呕吐或硬膜撕裂等并发症。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛缓解,23名患者术前VAS评分为7,14名患者评分为8,4名患者评分9。术后,18名患者(43.9%)VAS评分为2,23名患者(56%)评分为1,5名患者(12%)评分为0。结论:根据本研究的结果,对于合并症或ASA I/II级患者,脊麻可以被认为是全麻的合适替代品。该技术具有成本效益高、麻醉持续时间短、并发症少等优点。这些发现支持在腰椎病变有限的患者中使用脊柱麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信