Should Etest MICs for Yeasts Be Categorized by Reference (BPs/ECVs) or by Etest (ECVs) Cutoffs as Determinants of Emerging Resistance?

IF 2.3 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Current Fungal Infection Reports Pub Date : 2020-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s12281-020-00378-3

A. Espinel-Ingroff, E. Dannaoui

引用次数: 4

查看原文本刊更多论文

酵母的测试mic是否应按参考值(bp / ecv)分类，还是按测试值(ecv)截止值作为新出现耐药性的决定因素进行分类?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Current Fungal Infection Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of fungal infections. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as advances in diagnosis, current and emerging management approaches, and genomics and pathogenesis. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided, and an international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.