Patient engagement in the SPOR Evidence Alliance: Reflection and learnings

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Facets Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1139/facets-2021-0133
Linda C. Li, A. Hoens, L. Wilhelm, Vikram Bubber, Elliot PausJenssen, Annette M McKinnon, Jenny Leese, Thalia Otamendi, Clayon B. Hamilton, W. Zarin, A. Tricco
{"title":"Patient engagement in the SPOR Evidence Alliance: Reflection and learnings","authors":"Linda C. Li, A. Hoens, L. Wilhelm, Vikram Bubber, Elliot PausJenssen, Annette M McKinnon, Jenny Leese, Thalia Otamendi, Clayon B. Hamilton, W. Zarin, A. Tricco","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Evidence Alliance (EA) is a Canada-wide multi-stakeholder organization providing national-level support in knowledge synthesis, clinical practice guidelines development, and knowledge translation. With a mandate to deliver the best available evidence to inform health policy and improve patient care, the EA involves patients and their caregivers in its governance, research priority setting and conduct, and capacity building. To reflect on the experiences of patient involvement in its first three years, the organization conducted a self-study with 17 actively involved patient partners. They answered the Patient Engagement in Research Scale 22-item short form (PEIRS-22) and open-ended questions. Of the 15 respondents, 12 were women with a mean age of 62.6 years (SD 10.1). The mean PEIRS-22 score was 82.1 (SD 15.9), indicating perceived meaningful engagement. Analysis of the free-text answers identified three themes: ( i) communication: successes, changes, and improvements; ( ii) a respectful and welcoming environment; and ( iii) opportunities to learn and contribute. Patient partners noted the EA made genuine efforts to welcome them and value their contributions. They also identified a need for the organization to increase patient partner diversity. This self-study was perceived as rewarding as it provided a foundation for further growth in patient involvement within the organization.","PeriodicalId":48511,"journal":{"name":"Facets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facets","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2021-0133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Evidence Alliance (EA) is a Canada-wide multi-stakeholder organization providing national-level support in knowledge synthesis, clinical practice guidelines development, and knowledge translation. With a mandate to deliver the best available evidence to inform health policy and improve patient care, the EA involves patients and their caregivers in its governance, research priority setting and conduct, and capacity building. To reflect on the experiences of patient involvement in its first three years, the organization conducted a self-study with 17 actively involved patient partners. They answered the Patient Engagement in Research Scale 22-item short form (PEIRS-22) and open-ended questions. Of the 15 respondents, 12 were women with a mean age of 62.6 years (SD 10.1). The mean PEIRS-22 score was 82.1 (SD 15.9), indicating perceived meaningful engagement. Analysis of the free-text answers identified three themes: ( i) communication: successes, changes, and improvements; ( ii) a respectful and welcoming environment; and ( iii) opportunities to learn and contribute. Patient partners noted the EA made genuine efforts to welcome them and value their contributions. They also identified a need for the organization to increase patient partner diversity. This self-study was perceived as rewarding as it provided a foundation for further growth in patient involvement within the organization.
患者参与SPOR证据联盟:反思和学习
证据联盟(EA)是一个加拿大范围内的多方利益相关者组织,在知识综合、临床实践指南制定和知识翻译方面提供国家层面的支持。EA的任务是提供最佳可用证据,为卫生政策提供信息,改善患者护理,让患者及其护理人员参与其治理、研究优先事项的制定和实施以及能力建设。为了反思前三年患者参与的经历,该组织与17名积极参与的患者伙伴进行了自学。他们回答了患者参与研究量表22项简表(PEIRS-22)和开放式问题。在15名受访者中,12名为女性,平均年龄62.6岁(SD 10.1)。PEIRS-22的平均得分为82.1(SD 15.9),表明感知到有意义的参与。对自由文本答案的分析确定了三个主题:(i)沟通:成功、变化和改进;(ii)尊重和欢迎的环境;三学习和贡献的机会。患者合作伙伴指出,EA真诚地欢迎他们,并重视他们的贡献。他们还指出,该组织需要增加患者伙伴的多样性。这种自学被认为是有益的,因为它为患者在组织内的进一步参与奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Facets
Facets MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信