Nazwy austro-węgierskich jednostek wojskowych. Studium polityki nazewniczej z zakresu chrematonimii wojskowej

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Onomastica Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.17651/onomast.64.11
Wojciech Włoskowicz
{"title":"Nazwy austro-węgierskich jednostek wojskowych. Studium polityki nazewniczej z zakresu chrematonimii wojskowej","authors":"Wojciech Włoskowicz","doi":"10.17651/onomast.64.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to discuss selected formal and pragmatic aspects of the Austro-Hungarian military name policy in the last quarter of the 19th and in the early 20th century. In the introductory section the proprial status of the names of military units (which constitute a part of military chrematonymy) is discussed. An attempt is made to outline the location of these names on the classifi-catory map of chrematonomastics as well. A brief discussion of the historical and terminological background of the Austro-Hungarian military unit names follows. The most important concepts of the theory of name and naming policy are outlined. The presentation of the analysed onymic mate-rial covers unit names included in the officer lists (Schematismen) of the Austro-Hungarian forces as well as names present in the paper seals (Verschlussmarken). On the basis of the material, polymorphism of the discussed names is shown in the sense that obligatory and facultative elements of the names may appear in different ways and within various syntactic name models, depending on the context (including continuous text within which a name is used). Two main syntactic models of the discussed names are proposed. The orthographic and syntactic rules of unit numbering and the ways of embedding geographical names and names of patrons and honorary regiment owners (Inhaber) into unit names are outlined. The meaning and spelling of the expressions imperial-royal (k.k. = kaiserlich-königlich) and imperial and royal (k.u.k. = kaiserlich und königlich) are explained.","PeriodicalId":36198,"journal":{"name":"Onomastica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onomastica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17651/onomast.64.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss selected formal and pragmatic aspects of the Austro-Hungarian military name policy in the last quarter of the 19th and in the early 20th century. In the introductory section the proprial status of the names of military units (which constitute a part of military chrematonymy) is discussed. An attempt is made to outline the location of these names on the classifi-catory map of chrematonomastics as well. A brief discussion of the historical and terminological background of the Austro-Hungarian military unit names follows. The most important concepts of the theory of name and naming policy are outlined. The presentation of the analysed onymic mate-rial covers unit names included in the officer lists (Schematismen) of the Austro-Hungarian forces as well as names present in the paper seals (Verschlussmarken). On the basis of the material, polymorphism of the discussed names is shown in the sense that obligatory and facultative elements of the names may appear in different ways and within various syntactic name models, depending on the context (including continuous text within which a name is used). Two main syntactic models of the discussed names are proposed. The orthographic and syntactic rules of unit numbering and the ways of embedding geographical names and names of patrons and honorary regiment owners (Inhaber) into unit names are outlined. The meaning and spelling of the expressions imperial-royal (k.k. = kaiserlich-königlich) and imperial and royal (k.u.k. = kaiserlich und königlich) are explained.
奥匈军事单位名称。军事慢性病命名策略研究
本文的目的是讨论在19世纪最后25年和20世纪初奥匈帝国军队名称政策的正式和实用方面的选择。在引言部分,讨论了军事单位名称的专有地位(军事单位名称构成军事姓氏的一部分)。本文也试图勾勒出这些名称在色谱分类图上的位置。下面简要讨论奥匈帝国军队单位名称的历史和术语背景。概述了命名理论和命名策略中最重要的概念。所提供的经分析的匿名材料包括奥匈部队军官名单(Schematismen)中的单位名称以及纸封(Verschlussmarken)中的名称。在材料的基础上,所讨论的名称的多态性表明,名称的强制性和兼性元素可能以不同的方式和在不同的句法名称模型中出现,这取决于上下文(包括使用名称的连续文本)。提出了讨论名称的两种主要语法模型。概述了单位编号的正字法和句法规则,以及在单位名称中嵌入地名、赞助人姓名和荣誉团主(因哈伯)姓名的方法。解释了“imperial-royal”(k.k.k = kaiserlich-königlich)和“imperial and royal”(k.u.k = kaiserlich und königlich)的含义和拼写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Onomastica
Onomastica Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信