Book Review: Binhua Wang and Jeremy Munday (eds), Advances in Discourse Analysis of Translation and Interpreting (Linking Linguistic Approaches With Socio-Cultural Interpretation)

IF 1.4 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Nicolas Irawan
{"title":"Book Review: Binhua Wang and Jeremy Munday (eds), Advances in Discourse Analysis of Translation and Interpreting (Linking Linguistic Approaches With Socio-Cultural Interpretation)","authors":"Nicolas Irawan","doi":"10.1177/14614456231155309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These updates, together with those discussed above, help align this third edition with discourse studies’ cutting edge. Yet, in other ways, the book remains what it has been: an accessible, introductory guide to discourse analysis, one that, by definition and no doubt design, perhaps succeeds more in breadth than in depth. In his review of the first edition, Meadows (2010) noted the under-theorization of certain conceptual links between conversation analysis and ethnomethodology and between CDA and Marxism. Similarly, I suggest that in future editions Paltridge consider more thoroughly arguing his social constructionist perspective, perhaps contrasting its focus on individuals’ roles and interactions with, for instance, a Focualdian approach that accounts for how individuals interpret and reproduce those interactions (Khan and MacEachen, 2021). Guiding aspiring discourse analysts through this thinking could help further demonstrate the process of choosing and justifying a research approach. Also reviewing the first edition, Timofeeva (2008) noted that the book largely targeted language teachers, citing that focus as both a strength, for how it linked concepts to teaching environments, and a weakness, for potentially excluding social scientists interested in discourse studies. Two editions later – and despite mentions throughout of English as a lingua franca – some might claim of this edition the reverse: that the focus on language teaching has become all but obscured. Yet, if Paltridge’s primary audience has indeed shifted, it is now arguably more inclusive of those learning and using discourse analysis as a research tool. With its diverse illustrative examples, lucid summaries, discussion questions, exercises, sample studies, glossary, and suggested readings, as well as its accessible writing and pedagogical sequencing, this book is ideal for foundational discourse analysis courses in the social sciences and the humanities.","PeriodicalId":47598,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"454 - 456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231155309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

These updates, together with those discussed above, help align this third edition with discourse studies’ cutting edge. Yet, in other ways, the book remains what it has been: an accessible, introductory guide to discourse analysis, one that, by definition and no doubt design, perhaps succeeds more in breadth than in depth. In his review of the first edition, Meadows (2010) noted the under-theorization of certain conceptual links between conversation analysis and ethnomethodology and between CDA and Marxism. Similarly, I suggest that in future editions Paltridge consider more thoroughly arguing his social constructionist perspective, perhaps contrasting its focus on individuals’ roles and interactions with, for instance, a Focualdian approach that accounts for how individuals interpret and reproduce those interactions (Khan and MacEachen, 2021). Guiding aspiring discourse analysts through this thinking could help further demonstrate the process of choosing and justifying a research approach. Also reviewing the first edition, Timofeeva (2008) noted that the book largely targeted language teachers, citing that focus as both a strength, for how it linked concepts to teaching environments, and a weakness, for potentially excluding social scientists interested in discourse studies. Two editions later – and despite mentions throughout of English as a lingua franca – some might claim of this edition the reverse: that the focus on language teaching has become all but obscured. Yet, if Paltridge’s primary audience has indeed shifted, it is now arguably more inclusive of those learning and using discourse analysis as a research tool. With its diverse illustrative examples, lucid summaries, discussion questions, exercises, sample studies, glossary, and suggested readings, as well as its accessible writing and pedagogical sequencing, this book is ideal for foundational discourse analysis courses in the social sciences and the humanities.
书评:王滨华、蒙迪主编,《翻译的语篇分析进展》(将语言学方法与社会文化解释联系起来)
这些更新与上面讨论的内容一起,有助于使第三版与话语研究的前沿保持一致。然而,在其他方面,这本书仍然是它一直以来的样子:一本通俗易懂的话语分析入门指南,从定义和设计上来看,这本书的成功可能更多地在于广度而不是深度。在他对第一版的评论中,梅多斯(2010)指出了对话分析与民族方法学之间以及批评性话语分析与马克思主义之间某些概念联系的理论化不足。同样,我建议在未来的版本中,Paltridge考虑更彻底地论证他的社会建构主义观点,也许将其对个人角色和互动的关注与focaldian方法(例如,解释个人如何解释和再现这些互动)进行对比(Khan和MacEachen, 2021)。通过这种思维指导有抱负的话语分析可以帮助进一步展示选择和证明研究方法的过程。在回顾第一版时,Timofeeva(2008)指出,这本书主要针对语言教师,并指出这种关注既是一种优势,因为它将概念与教学环境联系起来,也是一种弱点,因为它可能会将对话语研究感兴趣的社会科学家排除在外。两个版本之后,尽管一直提到英语是通用语,但有些人可能会说这个版本正好相反:对语言教学的关注几乎变得模糊了。然而,如果帕尔特里奇的主要受众确实发生了变化,那么现在可以论证的是,它更包括那些学习和使用话语分析作为研究工具的人。其多样化的说明性的例子,清晰的总结,讨论问题,练习,样本研究,词汇表,并建议阅读,以及其可访问的写作和教学顺序,这本书是理想的基础话语分析课程在社会科学和人文科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discourse Studies
Discourse Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Discourse Studies is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal for the study of text and talk. Publishing outstanding work on the structures and strategies of written and spoken discourse, special attention is given to cross-disciplinary studies of text and talk in linguistics, anthropology, ethnomethodology, cognitive and social psychology, communication studies and law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信