Investigación en comunicación. Metodologías, temáticas y fuentes/ Communication research. Methodologies, themes and sources

IF 0.3 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Antonio Castillo-Esparcia, Elizabet Castillero-Ostio
{"title":"Investigación en comunicación. Metodologías, temáticas y fuentes/ Communication research. Methodologies, themes and sources","authors":"Antonio Castillo-Esparcia, Elizabet Castillero-Ostio","doi":"10.5783/REVRRPP.V9I18.622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Las revistas cientificas son actualmente el principal instrumento de divulgacion con el que cuenta la comunidad cientifica para transmitir sus investigaciones, siendo el ambito de la comunicacion uno de los que ha experimentado un mayor crecimiento en este tipo de publicaciones. Dada esta proliferacion de investigaciones en este campo, son necesarios los estudios bibliometricos como el presente, que persigue como objetivos primordiales: conocer el estado de la cuestion de la investigacion en el campo de la comunicacion en la actualidad a traves de un analisis de contenido, cuyas variables han permitido saber el genero de los autores, conocer su procedencia, estudiar la tipologia de investigacion, las metodologias de los textos y analizar el tipo de fuentes que utilizan en sus investigaciones. Se han analizado, como representativos, los 148 articulos que componen el primer numero publicado en los anos 2016 y 2017 por cada una de las diez primeras revistas de comunicacion indexadas en el  Journal Citation Reports (JCR), de  Web of Science . Los resultados nos han mostrado que la posicion de las mujeres respecto a los hombres en la autoria ha ido mejorando progresivamente. En cuanto a las referencias, se concluye que las autocitas son bastante frecuentes y van en aumento, ya que en 2016 el 84,61% de autores y autoras se autocitan, incrementandose la cifra en 2017 hasta un 88,57%. Ademas, la tendencia es el aumento de referencias a articulos de revistas en detrimento de los libros, dandose tambien la circunstancia de que transcurra menos tiempo desde que se publica un articulo hasta que se cita, que en el caso de los libros. Palabras clave: Revistas cientificas, Divulgacion, Investigacion, Comunicacion, Referencias, Metodologias Abstract Scientific journals are currently the main instrument of dissemination with which the scientific community transmits their researches, being the field of communication one of those that has experienced the greatest growth in this type of publications. Given the proliferation of researches in this field, bibliometric studies such us this one are necessary, which pursues as primary objectives: the currently knowledge of scientific activity in the field of communication and the analysis of the sources referenced in scientific articles; this will allow to discover the main theories and authors that support these articles in the main journals in the field of communication research. Content analysis has been used as a method, whose variables have allowed us to know the gender of the authors, their origin, the topic of the articles, the type of research, the methodologies of the texts and analyse the type of sources they use in their investigations. The 148 articles that make up the first issues published in 2016 and 2017, belonging to the first ten communication journals indexed in theJournal of Citation Reports(JCR), of Web of Science, have been analysed as representative. The results have shown us that the number of articles published in this type of journals is increasing, since they are higher in 2017 than in 2016. The number of signatories of each article is also increasing, being in 2016 the 2, 24 the average number and 3.31 in 2017. Analysing the gender variable, there is a notable difference between the two years; the number of men doubles the number of women in 2016, becoming stabilized in 2017. Regarding to the origin of the researchers, in both years studied, it is the USA the country with a higher percentage, followed by Netherlands and United Kingdom. Focusing the attention on Spanish researchers, they are only present in 2016 in the Communication Research magazine and in 2017 in the Journal of Communication. In both cases there is an article in each magazine where two Spanish people participate, doing it in collaboration with other researchers with different nationalities in 2017. In 2016, the most popular topic in scientific publications is health with 25.64%, secondly, it is advertising and communication campaigns with 12.81%, and the third one is social interaction with 11.50%. In 2017, the predominant theme is digital media (Internet, new technologies and social networks) with 30%, followed by social interaction with 21.44% and health communication with 12.58%. Regarding the references, it is concluded that citing themselves are quite frequent and they are increasing, since in 2016, 84.61% of authors cite themselves, increasing the figure in 2017 to 88.57%. It is found that this practice is increasing in order to give greater visibility to the work of the researchers themselves. Also, the tendency is the increase of references to articles of magazines to the detriment of the books, and also less time elapses since an article is published until it is cited, than in the case of books. Keywords: Scientific journals, Dissemination, Research, Communication, References, Methodologies http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-18-2019-11-197-218","PeriodicalId":42959,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional de Relaciones Publicas","volume":"9 1","pages":"197-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional de Relaciones Publicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5783/REVRRPP.V9I18.622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Las revistas cientificas son actualmente el principal instrumento de divulgacion con el que cuenta la comunidad cientifica para transmitir sus investigaciones, siendo el ambito de la comunicacion uno de los que ha experimentado un mayor crecimiento en este tipo de publicaciones. Dada esta proliferacion de investigaciones en este campo, son necesarios los estudios bibliometricos como el presente, que persigue como objetivos primordiales: conocer el estado de la cuestion de la investigacion en el campo de la comunicacion en la actualidad a traves de un analisis de contenido, cuyas variables han permitido saber el genero de los autores, conocer su procedencia, estudiar la tipologia de investigacion, las metodologias de los textos y analizar el tipo de fuentes que utilizan en sus investigaciones. Se han analizado, como representativos, los 148 articulos que componen el primer numero publicado en los anos 2016 y 2017 por cada una de las diez primeras revistas de comunicacion indexadas en el  Journal Citation Reports (JCR), de  Web of Science . Los resultados nos han mostrado que la posicion de las mujeres respecto a los hombres en la autoria ha ido mejorando progresivamente. En cuanto a las referencias, se concluye que las autocitas son bastante frecuentes y van en aumento, ya que en 2016 el 84,61% de autores y autoras se autocitan, incrementandose la cifra en 2017 hasta un 88,57%. Ademas, la tendencia es el aumento de referencias a articulos de revistas en detrimento de los libros, dandose tambien la circunstancia de que transcurra menos tiempo desde que se publica un articulo hasta que se cita, que en el caso de los libros. Palabras clave: Revistas cientificas, Divulgacion, Investigacion, Comunicacion, Referencias, Metodologias Abstract Scientific journals are currently the main instrument of dissemination with which the scientific community transmits their researches, being the field of communication one of those that has experienced the greatest growth in this type of publications. Given the proliferation of researches in this field, bibliometric studies such us this one are necessary, which pursues as primary objectives: the currently knowledge of scientific activity in the field of communication and the analysis of the sources referenced in scientific articles; this will allow to discover the main theories and authors that support these articles in the main journals in the field of communication research. Content analysis has been used as a method, whose variables have allowed us to know the gender of the authors, their origin, the topic of the articles, the type of research, the methodologies of the texts and analyse the type of sources they use in their investigations. The 148 articles that make up the first issues published in 2016 and 2017, belonging to the first ten communication journals indexed in theJournal of Citation Reports(JCR), of Web of Science, have been analysed as representative. The results have shown us that the number of articles published in this type of journals is increasing, since they are higher in 2017 than in 2016. The number of signatories of each article is also increasing, being in 2016 the 2, 24 the average number and 3.31 in 2017. Analysing the gender variable, there is a notable difference between the two years; the number of men doubles the number of women in 2016, becoming stabilized in 2017. Regarding to the origin of the researchers, in both years studied, it is the USA the country with a higher percentage, followed by Netherlands and United Kingdom. Focusing the attention on Spanish researchers, they are only present in 2016 in the Communication Research magazine and in 2017 in the Journal of Communication. In both cases there is an article in each magazine where two Spanish people participate, doing it in collaboration with other researchers with different nationalities in 2017. In 2016, the most popular topic in scientific publications is health with 25.64%, secondly, it is advertising and communication campaigns with 12.81%, and the third one is social interaction with 11.50%. In 2017, the predominant theme is digital media (Internet, new technologies and social networks) with 30%, followed by social interaction with 21.44% and health communication with 12.58%. Regarding the references, it is concluded that citing themselves are quite frequent and they are increasing, since in 2016, 84.61% of authors cite themselves, increasing the figure in 2017 to 88.57%. It is found that this practice is increasing in order to give greater visibility to the work of the researchers themselves. Also, the tendency is the increase of references to articles of magazines to the detriment of the books, and also less time elapses since an article is published until it is cited, than in the case of books. Keywords: Scientific journals, Dissemination, Research, Communication, References, Methodologies http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-18-2019-11-197-218
Investigación en comunicación。Metodologías, temáticas y fuentes/传播研究。方法、主题和来源
科学期刊是目前科学界传播其研究的主要传播工具,传播领域是这类出版物增长最快的领域之一。鉴于这一领域研究的激增,有必要进行文献计量学研究,其主要目标是:了解调查的状态就是重点领域的沟通,目前是通过内容分析,其已知道变量性别作者、来源、研究tipologia metodologias、调查和分析中的那种来源中使用自己的调查。作为代表,我们分析了在Web of Science的期刊引用报告(JCR)中索引的前10家传播期刊在2016年和2017年发表的第一期148篇文章。研究结果表明,女性在作者身份方面的地位逐渐提高。在参考文献方面,自引相当频繁,而且还在增加,2016年84.61%的作者自引,2017年增加到88.57%。此外,对期刊文章的引用增加了,而对书籍的引用却减少了,这也是一篇文章从发表到被引用的时间比书籍要短的事实。摘要科学期刊目前是科学界传播其研究成果的主要传播工具,传播领域是这类出版物增长最快的领域之一。鉴于这一领域的研究激增,文献计量学研究认为这是必要的,其主要目标是:传播领域科学活动的现有知识和对科学文章中引用的资料来源的分析;this will allow to the main不同and authors,支持这些《in the main的in the field of communication research。内容分析被用作一种方法,其变量使我们能够了解作者的性别、他们的来源、文章的主题、研究的类型、文本的方法,并分析他们在调查中使用的来源类型。这148篇文章构成了2016年和2017年发表的第一批问题,属于被Web of Science的期刊引用报告(JCR)索引的前10篇传播期刊,已被分析为具有代表性。结果表明,这类期刊发表的文章数量在增加,因为2017年的文章数量高于2016年。每一篇文章的署名人数也在增加,2016年为2.24人,2017年为3.31人。分析性别变量,这两年之间有显著差异;2016年男性人数是女性人数的两倍,2017年稳定下来。关于研究人员的起源,在研究的两个年份中,美国是比例最高的国家,其次是荷兰和英国。将注意力集中在西班牙研究人员上,他们只出现在2016年的《传播研究杂志》和2017年的《传播杂志》上。在这两种情况下,每个杂志上都有一篇文章,两名西班牙人参与,2017年与不同国籍的其他研究人员合作。2016年,科学出版物中最受欢迎的主题是健康,占25.64%,其次是广告和传播活动,占12.81%,第三是社会互动,占11.50%。2017年,主要主题是数字媒体(互联网、新技术和社交网络),占30%,其次是社会互动,占21.44%,健康传播,占12.58%。从参考文献来看,自2016年以来,84.61%的作者引用自己,2017年这一数字增加到88.57%。人们发现,这种做法正在增加,以便使研究人员本身的工作更加引人注目。此外,有一种趋势是越来越多的杂志文章提到书籍的有害影响,而且自从一篇文章发表以来,被引用的时间比书籍少。关键词:科学期刊,传播,研究,传播,参考文献,方法论http://dx.doi.org/10.5783/RIRP-18-2019-11-197-218
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信