The effects of cognitive load during an investigative interviewing task on mock interviewers’ recall of information

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Pamela Hanway, Lucy Akehurst, Zarah Vernham, Lorraine Hope
{"title":"The effects of cognitive load during an investigative interviewing task on mock interviewers’ recall of information","authors":"Pamela Hanway,&nbsp;Lucy Akehurst,&nbsp;Zarah Vernham,&nbsp;Lorraine Hope","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Although investigative interviewers receive training in interviewing techniques, they often fail to comply with recommended practices. Interviewers are required to actively listen, accurately remember information, think of questions to ask, make judgements, and seek clarification, whilst conducting interviews with witnesses, victims, or suspects. The current study examined the impact of increased cognitive load on mock interviewers’ recall of a witness’s account.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants took the role of an investigative interviewer in one of three conditions, high cognitive load (HCL), moderate cognitive load (MCL), or no cognitive load (NCL). Participants watched a video-recorded free narrative of a child witness during which they followed condition-relevant task instructions. Each participant rated their perceived cognitive load during their task and then recalled (free and cued recall) the content of the witness’s account.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants in the HCL and MCL conditions perceived higher cognitive load and demonstrated poorer performance on the free recall task than those in the NCL condition. Participants in the HCL condition demonstrated poorer performance on the cued recall task compared to participants in the NCL condition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The cognitive demands required to complete an investigative interview task led to an increased perceived cognitive load and had a negative impact on recall performance for mock interviewers. Accurately recalling what has been reported by a witness is vital during an investigation. Inaccurate recall can impact on interviewers’ questioning and their compliance with recommended interviewing practices. Developing and practising interview techniques may help interviewers to better cope with the high cognitive demands of investigative interviewing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"26 1","pages":"25-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lcrp.12182","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose

Although investigative interviewers receive training in interviewing techniques, they often fail to comply with recommended practices. Interviewers are required to actively listen, accurately remember information, think of questions to ask, make judgements, and seek clarification, whilst conducting interviews with witnesses, victims, or suspects. The current study examined the impact of increased cognitive load on mock interviewers’ recall of a witness’s account.

Method

Participants took the role of an investigative interviewer in one of three conditions, high cognitive load (HCL), moderate cognitive load (MCL), or no cognitive load (NCL). Participants watched a video-recorded free narrative of a child witness during which they followed condition-relevant task instructions. Each participant rated their perceived cognitive load during their task and then recalled (free and cued recall) the content of the witness’s account.

Results

Participants in the HCL and MCL conditions perceived higher cognitive load and demonstrated poorer performance on the free recall task than those in the NCL condition. Participants in the HCL condition demonstrated poorer performance on the cued recall task compared to participants in the NCL condition.

Conclusions

The cognitive demands required to complete an investigative interview task led to an increased perceived cognitive load and had a negative impact on recall performance for mock interviewers. Accurately recalling what has been reported by a witness is vital during an investigation. Inaccurate recall can impact on interviewers’ questioning and their compliance with recommended interviewing practices. Developing and practising interview techniques may help interviewers to better cope with the high cognitive demands of investigative interviewing.

Abstract Image

调查性访谈任务中认知负荷对模拟采访者信息回忆的影响
虽然调查性采访者接受过采访技巧方面的培训,但他们经常不能遵守建议的做法。采访者在采访证人、受害者或嫌疑人时,需要积极倾听、准确记忆信息、思考问题、做出判断并寻求澄清。目前的研究考察了认知负荷增加对模拟采访者回忆证人陈述的影响。方法参与者在高认知负荷(HCL)、中度认知负荷(MCL)和无认知负荷(NCL)三种情况下扮演调查性访谈者的角色。参与者观看了一段免费的视频,讲述了一名儿童证人的故事,在此期间,他们遵循了与条件相关的任务指示。每个参与者对他们在任务中感知到的认知负荷进行打分,然后回忆(自由回忆和暗示回忆)证人的叙述内容。结果与NCL组相比,HCL组和MCL组在自由回忆任务上的认知负荷更高,表现较差。与NCL条件下的参与者相比,HCL条件下的参与者在线索回忆任务上表现较差。结论完成调查性访谈任务所需的认知需求导致认知负荷增加,并对模拟访谈者的回忆表现产生负向影响。在调查过程中,准确地回忆证人所述是至关重要的。不准确的回忆会影响面试官的提问和他们对推荐的面试方法的依从性。发展和练习访谈技巧可以帮助访谈者更好地应对调查性访谈的高认知要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信