On the essay as a paroxismal form of the utopian thinking: present living pasts

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Digithum Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.7238/d.v0i20.3099
Daniel Gutiérrez-Martínez
{"title":"On the essay as a paroxismal form of the utopian thinking: present living pasts","authors":"Daniel Gutiérrez-Martínez","doi":"10.7238/d.v0i20.3099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the role of the essay in the expression of knowledge and argues that this discursive style, in contrast with the academic paper as a form to disseminate knowledge, allows us to consider possible utopias, since it provides a link between past and present, between memory and oblivion, between the archaic and the prospective. This paper argues that the essay is a paroxismal narrative which rightly expresses the convergence of both past and present collective emotions in opposition to the scientificist rationality which is characteristic of the academic paper. This paper aims to reclaim the role of this discursive formula in the production of collective knowledge as well as to place it in its right context: that of the occurring pre-texts, particularly in the debate on the objectivity and subjectivity of knowledge-related procedures that takes place between the dynamics of the essay and the logic of the “scientific” paper. The link between the essay and the awareness of the collectively lived present, the connection of present utopian archaisms, will be shown by comparing the Medieval Universitates against the enlighted universities and the initiatory rites against the evidence of the sacred data. The goal of this comparison is to highlight knowledge-related writings that integrate emotions as knowledge entities.","PeriodicalId":51964,"journal":{"name":"Digithum","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digithum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i20.3099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the role of the essay in the expression of knowledge and argues that this discursive style, in contrast with the academic paper as a form to disseminate knowledge, allows us to consider possible utopias, since it provides a link between past and present, between memory and oblivion, between the archaic and the prospective. This paper argues that the essay is a paroxismal narrative which rightly expresses the convergence of both past and present collective emotions in opposition to the scientificist rationality which is characteristic of the academic paper. This paper aims to reclaim the role of this discursive formula in the production of collective knowledge as well as to place it in its right context: that of the occurring pre-texts, particularly in the debate on the objectivity and subjectivity of knowledge-related procedures that takes place between the dynamics of the essay and the logic of the “scientific” paper. The link between the essay and the awareness of the collectively lived present, the connection of present utopian archaisms, will be shown by comparing the Medieval Universitates against the enlighted universities and the initiatory rites against the evidence of the sacred data. The goal of this comparison is to highlight knowledge-related writings that integrate emotions as knowledge entities.
论散文作为乌托邦思维的一种悖论形式:现在的、活生生的过去
本文探讨了这篇文章在知识表达中的作用,并认为这种话语风格,与学术论文作为传播知识的形式相比,允许我们考虑可能的乌托邦,因为它提供了过去和现在之间、记忆和遗忘之间、古代和未来之间的联系。本文认为,这篇文章是一篇模仿性的叙述,它正确地表达了过去和现在集体情绪的趋同,与学术论文所特有的科学主义理性背道而驰。本文旨在重新审视这种话语公式在集体知识产生中的作用,并将其置于正确的语境中:即发生在前文本中的语境,特别是在文章的动态和“科学”论文的逻辑之间关于知识相关程序的客观性和主观性的辩论中。通过将中世纪大学与启蒙大学以及启蒙仪式与神圣数据的证据进行比较,可以看出这篇文章与集体生活的当下意识之间的联系,即当下乌托邦古训的联系。这种比较的目的是强调将情感整合为知识实体的知识相关写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digithum
Digithum HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Digithum applies a relational perspective in the analysis of processes of inclusion and social exclusion, subjective experiences, social ties, cultural heritage and cultural production and consumption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信