A critical assessment of ex situ conservation based on the Brazilian avifauna: Are we focusing on what is easier?

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Renato Feliciano , Abraão de Barros Leite , Maíra Castro Garbeloto , Luís Fábio Silveira , Mercival Roberto Francisco
{"title":"A critical assessment of ex situ conservation based on the Brazilian avifauna: Are we focusing on what is easier?","authors":"Renato Feliciano ,&nbsp;Abraão de Barros Leite ,&nbsp;Maíra Castro Garbeloto ,&nbsp;Luís Fábio Silveira ,&nbsp;Mercival Roberto Francisco","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Species have been lost at unprecedented rates. Because only a small fraction of the threatened taxa have been managed under human care, contrasting the characteristics of taxa that have, and have not been targeted to <em>ex situ</em> conservation can reveal the reach of this conservation strategy, and can indicate its main challenges. Here we investigated whether the level of threat, diet, body mass, phylogeny, and previous presence in captivity due to non-conservation purposes could be potential parameters accounting for the occurrence of Brazilian threatened avian species and subspecies in <em>ex situ</em> conservation facilities and for their eligibility to organized <em>ex situ</em> conservation plans. Using Bayesian phylogenetic comparative models we found positive effects of body mass and phylogeny, and a negative effect of insectivorous diet in the occurrence of the taxa in non-conservation facilities. The previous presence in non-conservation facilities, together with phylogeny, diet, and body mass were the main parameters accounting for the occurrence of the threatened taxa in <em>ex situ</em> conservation facilities, and the previous presence in non-conservation facilities and phylogeny explained the existence of organized <em>ex situ</em> conservation plans. This is evidence that conservation breeding facilities have mostly harbored threatened confiscated birds than choosing them based on scientific criteria. We suggest that investing in the development of husbandry techniques, especially for insectivorous passerines, and choosing taxa based on scientific criteria are important challenges that should be on the agenda of conservation managers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"21 1","pages":"Pages 62-70"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S253006442200075X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Species have been lost at unprecedented rates. Because only a small fraction of the threatened taxa have been managed under human care, contrasting the characteristics of taxa that have, and have not been targeted to ex situ conservation can reveal the reach of this conservation strategy, and can indicate its main challenges. Here we investigated whether the level of threat, diet, body mass, phylogeny, and previous presence in captivity due to non-conservation purposes could be potential parameters accounting for the occurrence of Brazilian threatened avian species and subspecies in ex situ conservation facilities and for their eligibility to organized ex situ conservation plans. Using Bayesian phylogenetic comparative models we found positive effects of body mass and phylogeny, and a negative effect of insectivorous diet in the occurrence of the taxa in non-conservation facilities. The previous presence in non-conservation facilities, together with phylogeny, diet, and body mass were the main parameters accounting for the occurrence of the threatened taxa in ex situ conservation facilities, and the previous presence in non-conservation facilities and phylogeny explained the existence of organized ex situ conservation plans. This is evidence that conservation breeding facilities have mostly harbored threatened confiscated birds than choosing them based on scientific criteria. We suggest that investing in the development of husbandry techniques, especially for insectivorous passerines, and choosing taxa based on scientific criteria are important challenges that should be on the agenda of conservation managers.

Abstract Image

基于巴西鸟类群的迁地保护关键评估:我们是否专注于更容易的事情?
物种以前所未有的速度消失。由于只有一小部分濒危类群受到了人类的保护,因此对比已经和尚未成为迁地保护目标的类群的特征,可以揭示这种保护策略的范围,并指出其主要挑战。在这里,我们调查了威胁水平、饮食、体重、系统发育和以前因非保护目的而被圈养的情况是否可能是影响巴西濒危鸟类物种和亚种在迁地保护设施中发生的潜在参数,以及它们是否有资格参加有组织的迁地保护计划。利用贝叶斯系统发育比较模型,我们发现在非保护设施中,体质量和系统发育对类群的发生有积极影响,而食虫饮食对类群的发生有消极影响。非保护设施的存在史、系统发育、饮食和体重是迁移地保护设施中濒危类群发生的主要参数,非保护设施的存在史和系统发育解释了有组织的迁移地保护计划的存在。这证明,保护繁殖设施大多窝藏被没收的濒危鸟类,而不是根据科学标准选择它们。我们建议投资发展畜牧业技术,特别是对食虫雀鸟的养殖技术,并根据科学标准选择类群,这是保护管理者应该考虑的重要挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信