求助PDF
{"title":"Potential greenhouse gas emissions and reduction from municipal solid waste management in Phnom Penh municipality","authors":"Dek Vimean Pheakdey, Nguyen Van Quan, Tran Dang Xuan","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and reduction potential from municipal solid waste management (MSWM) following the IPCC 2006 guidelines. Under different MSWM scenarios of Phnom Penh municipality, this study quantifies GHG emissions from transportation, open burning, composting, recycling, anaerobic digestion (AD), incineration, and landfilling municipal solid waste. The study also considers the GHG emissions avoided as a benefit of recycling and electricity generation from incineration and AD. Various waste separation rates are used to evaluate the effectiveness of source segregation in GHG mitigation. The results show that the most significant net GHG emission saving is under scenario 5, avoiding about 1.15 M kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/day with treatment affords 389 t/day of organic waste, 714 t/day of mixed recyclables, 777 t/day of digestible food waste, and 1,280 t/day of commingled waste via composting, recycling, AD, and incineration, respectively. The worst-case scenario represents the current MSWM method, which generates the highest GHG emissions of 3.13 M kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/day. This is due to the open burning of uncollected waste (211 t/day) and landfilling (2,835 t/day). Based on the analysis, an integrated MSWM system along with source separation for recycling and resource recovery purposes is highly recommended as it leads to the most significant reduction in environmental impacts. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the practical implications of policy frameworks for MSWM, specifically in terms of GHG emissions reduction. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"13 5","pages":"620-633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
This study evaluates greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and reduction potential from municipal solid waste management (MSWM) following the IPCC 2006 guidelines. Under different MSWM scenarios of Phnom Penh municipality, this study quantifies GHG emissions from transportation, open burning, composting, recycling, anaerobic digestion (AD), incineration, and landfilling municipal solid waste. The study also considers the GHG emissions avoided as a benefit of recycling and electricity generation from incineration and AD. Various waste separation rates are used to evaluate the effectiveness of source segregation in GHG mitigation. The results show that the most significant net GHG emission saving is under scenario 5, avoiding about 1.15 M kg CO2 -eq/day with treatment affords 389 t/day of organic waste, 714 t/day of mixed recyclables, 777 t/day of digestible food waste, and 1,280 t/day of commingled waste via composting, recycling, AD, and incineration, respectively. The worst-case scenario represents the current MSWM method, which generates the highest GHG emissions of 3.13 M kg CO2 -eq/day. This is due to the open burning of uncollected waste (211 t/day) and landfilling (2,835 t/day). Based on the analysis, an integrated MSWM system along with source separation for recycling and resource recovery purposes is highly recommended as it leads to the most significant reduction in environmental impacts. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the practical implications of policy frameworks for MSWM, specifically in terms of GHG emissions reduction. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
金边市城市固体废物管理的潜在温室气体排放和减少
本研究根据IPCC 2006年指南评估了城市固体废物管理(MSWM)的温室气体(GHG)排放和减排潜力。在金边市不同的城市固体废物管理情景下,本研究量化了城市固体废物运输、露天焚烧、堆肥、回收、厌氧消化(AD)、焚烧和填埋的温室气体排放。该研究还认为,避免温室气体排放是回收利用和焚烧和AD发电的好处。采用不同的废物分类率来评估源分类在减缓温室气体方面的有效性。结果表明,在情景5下,温室气体净减排效果最显著,减排约1.15 M kg co2当量/d,处理方式分别为堆肥、回收、AD和焚烧,有机垃圾389 t/d,混合可回收物714 t/d,可消化食物垃圾777 t/d,混合垃圾1280 t/d。最坏的情况是目前的MSWM方法,它产生的温室气体排放量最高,为3.13 M kg co2当量/天。这是由于露天焚烧未收集的废物(211吨/天)和填埋(2,835吨/天)。根据分析,我们强烈建议采用综合的都市固体废物管理系统,并将废物来源分离,以作循环再造和资源回收之用,因为这可大大减少对环境的影响。本研究的结果为MSWM政策框架的实际意义提供了有价值的见解,特别是在温室气体减排方面。©2023化学工业协会和John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。