Introduction: memory and recognition of the Nazi genocide of the Roma in the Baltic context

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Volha Bartash, Neringa Latvytė
{"title":"Introduction: memory and recognition of the Nazi genocide of the Roma in the Baltic context","authors":"Volha Bartash, Neringa Latvytė","doi":"10.1080/01629778.2023.2162681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Wanda Stankiewicz, a survivor of the concentration camp in Pravieniškės, Lithuania, returned to her hometown, Eišiškės, in 1944, she found almost no one of her community left alive. Many of her kin perished in Pravieniškės. Others were killed in the mass shootings at the border with Belarus or were deported to Germany for forced labor. Staying in the middle of her destroyed town, once a home to a vibrant Roma community, Wanda realized that she was left alone to struggle for her living in a hostile world. Every survivor had a unique story. Yet their accounts of return often sound alike. As surviving Roma left their forest hideouts and returned from concentrations camps, they faced the bitter reality of community destruction in which they now had to live. Even the testimonies recorded decades after World War II narrate the experiences of return in terms of loss, loneliness, and alienation. As Slawomir Kapralski notes, ‘This experience subverted the sense of traditional culture and left Roma survivors with a permanently emasculated culture, ruined tradition, destroyed family and clan bonds, and weakened system of cultural cohesion’ (see Kapralski 2022 in this Special Issue). In his contribution, Kapralski further reveals how the trauma encoded in Romani culture and came to define the relations between Roma and ‘others.’ The above seems hardly surprising in the view of existing, though preliminary, statistics on the losses of Romani communities. For the Roma of the Baltic region, the war and genocide were devastating. Arguably, only one in three Roma in Lithuania, one in two Roma in Latvia and one in ten Roma in Estonia survived the war (see Kott 2015). In the cases of Latvia and Lithuania, these estimates might be even higher, since it is as difficult to account for all victims of the Holocaust by bullets as it is to say how many Roma died, while hiding in the wilderness – from starvation, infectious diseases, natural threats, and the severe climate (Bartash 2023b). The Romani population of Estonia was almost completely destroyed in the course of well-planned and countrywide police actions (see Weiss-Wendt 2022 in this Special Issue). After World War II, the Romani picture of the region where diverse Romani groups were once at home, significantly changed. The Laiuse Roma, for instance, who had centuries of history in Estonia, were completely swept away (see Weiss-Wendt 2022 in this Special Issue). After the war, Russka Roma from Latvia gradually took their place (see Roht-Yilmaz 2022 in this Special Issue). Likewise, Many Polska Roma of the Vilnius region chose to join postwar population transfers between Poland and the Soviet Union, leaving behind the places where they had lived and traveled since the seventeenth century (for more examples, see Bartash 2023b). Eve Rosenhaft’s contribution sheds light on the fates of Sinti from East Prussia who bore a double trauma – as victims of Nazi persecution and as German expellees from the area that became Kaliningrad region of the Soviet Union after the war. JOURNAL OF BALTIC STUDIES 2023, VOL. 54, NO. 1, 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2023.2162681","PeriodicalId":51813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Baltic Studies","volume":"54 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Baltic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2023.2162681","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When Wanda Stankiewicz, a survivor of the concentration camp in Pravieniškės, Lithuania, returned to her hometown, Eišiškės, in 1944, she found almost no one of her community left alive. Many of her kin perished in Pravieniškės. Others were killed in the mass shootings at the border with Belarus or were deported to Germany for forced labor. Staying in the middle of her destroyed town, once a home to a vibrant Roma community, Wanda realized that she was left alone to struggle for her living in a hostile world. Every survivor had a unique story. Yet their accounts of return often sound alike. As surviving Roma left their forest hideouts and returned from concentrations camps, they faced the bitter reality of community destruction in which they now had to live. Even the testimonies recorded decades after World War II narrate the experiences of return in terms of loss, loneliness, and alienation. As Slawomir Kapralski notes, ‘This experience subverted the sense of traditional culture and left Roma survivors with a permanently emasculated culture, ruined tradition, destroyed family and clan bonds, and weakened system of cultural cohesion’ (see Kapralski 2022 in this Special Issue). In his contribution, Kapralski further reveals how the trauma encoded in Romani culture and came to define the relations between Roma and ‘others.’ The above seems hardly surprising in the view of existing, though preliminary, statistics on the losses of Romani communities. For the Roma of the Baltic region, the war and genocide were devastating. Arguably, only one in three Roma in Lithuania, one in two Roma in Latvia and one in ten Roma in Estonia survived the war (see Kott 2015). In the cases of Latvia and Lithuania, these estimates might be even higher, since it is as difficult to account for all victims of the Holocaust by bullets as it is to say how many Roma died, while hiding in the wilderness – from starvation, infectious diseases, natural threats, and the severe climate (Bartash 2023b). The Romani population of Estonia was almost completely destroyed in the course of well-planned and countrywide police actions (see Weiss-Wendt 2022 in this Special Issue). After World War II, the Romani picture of the region where diverse Romani groups were once at home, significantly changed. The Laiuse Roma, for instance, who had centuries of history in Estonia, were completely swept away (see Weiss-Wendt 2022 in this Special Issue). After the war, Russka Roma from Latvia gradually took their place (see Roht-Yilmaz 2022 in this Special Issue). Likewise, Many Polska Roma of the Vilnius region chose to join postwar population transfers between Poland and the Soviet Union, leaving behind the places where they had lived and traveled since the seventeenth century (for more examples, see Bartash 2023b). Eve Rosenhaft’s contribution sheds light on the fates of Sinti from East Prussia who bore a double trauma – as victims of Nazi persecution and as German expellees from the area that became Kaliningrad region of the Soviet Union after the war. JOURNAL OF BALTIC STUDIES 2023, VOL. 54, NO. 1, 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2023.2162681
引言:波罗的海背景下纳粹对罗姆人的种族灭绝的记忆和认识
1944年,立陶宛Pravieniškïs集中营的幸存者Wanda Stankiewicz回到家乡Eišiškës时,她发现社区里几乎没有人活着。她的许多亲属在Pravieniškïs丧生。其他人在白俄罗斯边境的大规模枪击事件中丧生,或因强迫劳动被驱逐到德国。旺达住在她被摧毁的小镇中心,这里曾经是一个充满活力的罗姆人社区的家园,她意识到自己只能独自一人在一个充满敌意的世界里挣扎。每个幸存者都有自己独特的故事。然而,他们对回报的描述往往听起来很相似。当幸存的罗姆人离开他们的森林藏身处,从集中营返回时,他们面临着社区毁灭的痛苦现实,他们现在不得不生活在其中。即使是二战后几十年记录的证词,也从失落、孤独和疏离的角度讲述了回归的经历。正如Slawomir Kapralski所指出的,“这种经历颠覆了传统文化的意义,给罗姆幸存者留下了一种永久阉割的文化,破坏了传统,摧毁了家庭和部族纽带,削弱了文化凝聚力”(见本期特刊《Kapralski 2022》)。Kapralski在他的贡献中进一步揭示了创伤是如何融入罗姆人文化的,并定义了罗姆人与“他人”之间的关系从现有的罗姆人社区损失统计数据来看,尽管是初步的,但上述情况似乎并不令人惊讶。对波罗的海地区的罗姆人来说,战争和种族灭绝是毁灭性的。可以说,立陶宛只有三分之一的罗姆人、拉脱维亚的两分之一罗姆人和爱沙尼亚的十分之一罗姆人在战争中幸存下来(见Kott 2015)。在拉脱维亚和立陶宛的情况下,这些估计可能更高,因为很难解释所有被子弹击中的大屠杀受害者,就像很难说出有多少罗姆人在野外躲避饥饿、传染病、自然威胁和恶劣气候而死亡一样(Bartash 2023b)。在精心策划的全国性警察行动中,爱沙尼亚的罗姆人几乎被完全摧毁(见本特刊中的Weiss Wendt 2022)。第二次世界大战后,该地区的罗姆人形象发生了重大变化,那里曾经有不同的罗姆人群体。例如,在爱沙尼亚有着数百年历史的莱乌兹罗姆人被彻底清除了(见本期特刊中的Weiss Wendt 2022)。战后,来自拉脱维亚的Russka Roma逐渐取代了他们的位置(见本特刊《Roht Yilmaz 2022》)。同样,维尔纽斯地区的许多波尔斯卡罗姆人选择加入战后波兰和苏联之间的人口转移,留下了自17世纪以来他们居住和旅行的地方(更多例子,见Bartash 2023b)。伊芙·罗森哈夫的贡献揭示了来自东普鲁士的辛蒂的命运,辛蒂承受着双重创伤——既是纳粹迫害的受害者,也是战后被德国驱逐出苏联加里宁格勒地区的人。《波罗的海研究杂志2023》,第54卷,第1期,第1-6页https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2023.2162681
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Baltic Studies, the official journal of the Association for the Advancement of Baltic Studies (AABS), is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal for the purpose of advancing the accumulation of knowledge about all aspects of the Baltic Sea region"s political, social, economic, and cultural life, past and present. Preference is given to original contributions that are of general scholarly interest. The Association for the Advancement of Baltic Studies is an international, educational, and scholarly non-profit organization. Established in 1968, the purpose of the Association is the promotion of research and education in Baltic Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信