Comparison between Placement of an Amniotic Membrane Contact Lens and Temporary Amniotic Membrane Transplantation

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
S. Choi, Jae Won Choi, W. Park
{"title":"Comparison between Placement of an Amniotic Membrane Contact Lens and Temporary Amniotic Membrane Transplantation","authors":"S. Choi, Jae Won Choi, W. Park","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.6.466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We compared the clinical utilities of an amniotic contact lens and temporary amniotic membrane transplantation in patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects.Methods: Patients diagnosed with persistent corneal epithelial defects from November 2019 to July 2022 were randomly assigned to either lens placement for 2 weeks or temporary transplantation for 1 week, and the outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The best-corrected visual acuity, corneal sensation, tear film break-up time, and corneal opacity were measured before and after the interventions. The treatment success rates, recurrences, and other complications were analyzed during the follow-up period.Results: We placed lenses in 32 patients (32 eyes) and 20 patients (20 eyes) underwent transplantation. In both groups, significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity, corneal sensation, tear film break-up time, and corneal opacity were apparent after intervention vs. before. None of the parameters showed any significant differences in terms of their rates of change.Conclusions: In patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects, amniotic contact lens placement is an effective outpatient procedure and is not inferior to temporary amniotic membrane transplantation.","PeriodicalId":17341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.6.466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the clinical utilities of an amniotic contact lens and temporary amniotic membrane transplantation in patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects.Methods: Patients diagnosed with persistent corneal epithelial defects from November 2019 to July 2022 were randomly assigned to either lens placement for 2 weeks or temporary transplantation for 1 week, and the outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. The best-corrected visual acuity, corneal sensation, tear film break-up time, and corneal opacity were measured before and after the interventions. The treatment success rates, recurrences, and other complications were analyzed during the follow-up period.Results: We placed lenses in 32 patients (32 eyes) and 20 patients (20 eyes) underwent transplantation. In both groups, significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity, corneal sensation, tear film break-up time, and corneal opacity were apparent after intervention vs. before. None of the parameters showed any significant differences in terms of their rates of change.Conclusions: In patients with persistent corneal epithelial defects, amniotic contact lens placement is an effective outpatient procedure and is not inferior to temporary amniotic membrane transplantation.
放置羊膜接触镜与临时羊膜移植的比较
目的:比较羊膜接触镜与临时羊膜移植治疗持续性角膜上皮缺损的临床效果。方法:将2019年11月至2022年7月诊断为持续性角膜上皮缺损的患者随机分配到晶状体放置2周或临时移植1周,并对结果进行回顾性分析。测量干预前后的最佳矫正视力、角膜感觉、泪膜破裂时间和角膜混浊度。随访期间对治疗成功率、复发率及其他并发症进行分析。结果:32例(32眼)置入晶状体,20例(20眼)移植。两组患者的最佳矫正视力、角膜感觉、泪膜破裂时间和角膜混浊度在干预前后均有显著差异。这些参数在变化率方面没有任何显著差异。结论:对于持续性角膜上皮缺损患者,羊膜隐形眼镜置入术是一种有效的门诊治疗方法,其效果并不亚于临时羊膜移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信