Ethnic Essentialism or Conciliatory Multiculturalism? The People’s Republic of China

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Journal of Cognition and Culture Pub Date : 2020-12-11 DOI:10.1163/15685373-12340093

Raymond Scupin

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous scholars from different fields ranging from history, political science, ethnic and cultural studies, sociology, and anthropology have discussed ethnic and racial identity issues in the People’s Republic of China. Most have noted that there are competing narratives regarding the conceptions of race and ethnicity. Much of the scholarship has been based on social constructivist orientations. This essay is directed towards a merger between social constructivist and cognitive science approaches on essentialism that may open the doors for further research and investigation of this important topic.

查看原文本刊更多论文

民族本质主义还是和解的多元文化主义?中华人民共和国

来自历史学、政治学、民族与文化研究、社会学和人类学等不同领域的众多学者讨论了中华人民共和国的民族和种族认同问题。大多数人都注意到，关于种族和民族的概念存在着相互矛盾的叙述。很多学术研究都是基于社会建构主义取向。本文旨在将社会建构主义和认知科学的本质主义研究方法结合起来，为进一步研究和调查这一重要课题打开大门。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Cognition and Culture PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Cognition and Culture provides an interdisciplinary forum for exploring the mental foundations of culture and the cultural foundations of mental life. The primary focus of the journal is on explanations of cultural phenomena in terms of acquisition, representation and transmission involving cognitive capacities without excluding the study of cultural differences. The journal contains articles, commentaries, reports of experiments, and book reviews that emerge out of the inquiries by, and conversations between, scholars in experimental psychology, developmental psychology, social cognition, neuroscience, human evolution, cognitive science of religion, and cognitive anthropology.