Modern Industry and the Peasant Economy in China (中国近代工业与小农经济)

Q3 Arts and Humanities
G. Lin
{"title":"Modern Industry and the Peasant Economy in China (中国近代工业与小农经济)","authors":"G. Lin","doi":"10.1163/22136746-20170001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its early history, due to the various constraints in exchanging with other civilizations, China has relied mainly on domestic resources to satisfy the needs of its population for consumption and employment and to solve the challenges that confronted the state. Central to this solution is the combination of the agriculture of the peasant family with traditional industry and sidelines, a process that evolved over thousands of years of persistent experiments, in which the biggest challenge lay in the constant tension between population growth and the constraint of resources on the satisfaction of subsistence needs. The advent of Western influences in the late Qing period made available the products of mass-manufacturing by machines to Chinese peasants as raw materials of the family-based industry and sidelines, hence the addition of a new factor to the preexisting pattern of resource allocation. What emerged in modern China thus was an unprecedented “modern tripartite structure” that encompassed the new-style family economy, modern industrial economy, and traditional rural economy. Nevertheless, the loss of the country’s sovereign rights and the recurrence of war impeded the transformation of the traditional mode of production that entailed the intervention of the state; the same factors also explain the failure of spontaneous non-governmental forces in developing a national economy in which industry and agriculture grew in full coordination with each other.由于国际交流环境的不利,中国自早期文明伊始,就只能主要依靠在领土范围内解决吃饭和就业等国计民生首要问题。这是靠小农家庭农业与工副业的结合,在数千年的不懈奋斗中完成的。农民家庭经济的最大问题是人口增加与谋生资源难以满足之间的压力。清末列强入侵后,农民紧紧抓住大机器产品作为家庭工副业的生产原料,为改进原有的资源配置增加了新因素。近代中国史无前例地出现了新式家庭经济、现代工业经济与传统农村经济的“近代三元结构”。但由于丧失国权、战乱频仍,需要国家之力介入的旧生产方式变革、工业与农业全方位协调发展的国民经济格局,未能由民间自发力量完成。(This article is in Chinese.)","PeriodicalId":37171,"journal":{"name":"Rural China","volume":"14 1","pages":"271-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22136746-20170001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22136746-20170001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since its early history, due to the various constraints in exchanging with other civilizations, China has relied mainly on domestic resources to satisfy the needs of its population for consumption and employment and to solve the challenges that confronted the state. Central to this solution is the combination of the agriculture of the peasant family with traditional industry and sidelines, a process that evolved over thousands of years of persistent experiments, in which the biggest challenge lay in the constant tension between population growth and the constraint of resources on the satisfaction of subsistence needs. The advent of Western influences in the late Qing period made available the products of mass-manufacturing by machines to Chinese peasants as raw materials of the family-based industry and sidelines, hence the addition of a new factor to the preexisting pattern of resource allocation. What emerged in modern China thus was an unprecedented “modern tripartite structure” that encompassed the new-style family economy, modern industrial economy, and traditional rural economy. Nevertheless, the loss of the country’s sovereign rights and the recurrence of war impeded the transformation of the traditional mode of production that entailed the intervention of the state; the same factors also explain the failure of spontaneous non-governmental forces in developing a national economy in which industry and agriculture grew in full coordination with each other.由于国际交流环境的不利,中国自早期文明伊始,就只能主要依靠在领土范围内解决吃饭和就业等国计民生首要问题。这是靠小农家庭农业与工副业的结合,在数千年的不懈奋斗中完成的。农民家庭经济的最大问题是人口增加与谋生资源难以满足之间的压力。清末列强入侵后,农民紧紧抓住大机器产品作为家庭工副业的生产原料,为改进原有的资源配置增加了新因素。近代中国史无前例地出现了新式家庭经济、现代工业经济与传统农村经济的“近代三元结构”。但由于丧失国权、战乱频仍,需要国家之力介入的旧生产方式变革、工业与农业全方位协调发展的国民经济格局,未能由民间自发力量完成。(This article is in Chinese.)
Modern Industry and the Peasant Economy in China
Since its early history, due to the various constraints in exchange with other civilizations, China has been received mainly on domestic resources to satisfy the needs of its population for consumption and deployment and to solve the challenges that come before the state Central to this solution is the combination of the culture of the peer family with traditional industry and sidelines, a process that evolved over thoughts of years of persistent experiences, in which the big challenge lay in the constant tension between population growth and the constraint of resources on the satisfaction of existence needs The incident of Western influences in the late Qing period made available the products of mass manufacturing by machines to Chinese scholars as raw materials of the family based industry and sides, since the addition of a new factor to the preexisting pattern of resource allocation What emerged in modern China that was an unexpected "modern partition structure" that encompassed the new style family economy, modern industrial economy, and traditional rural economy Nevertheless, the loss of the country's sovereignty rights and the recurrence of war impacted the transformation of the traditional mode of production that entered the intervention of the state; The same factors also explain the failure of frontier non governmental forces in developing a national economy in which industry and agriculture are green in full coordination with each other. Due to the unfavorable international exchange environment, since the beginning of early civilization, China has had to mainly rely on solving the primary issues of national economy and people's livelihood within its territory, such as food and employment. This was achieved through thousands of years of unremitting struggle through the combination of small-scale peasant family agriculture and industry and sidelines. The biggest problem with the economy of farmers' families is the pressure between population growth and the difficulty in meeting their livelihood resources. After the invasion of foreign powers in the late Qing Dynasty, farmers tightly grasped the production of large machine products as raw materials for household work and sidelines, adding new factors to improve the original resource allocation. The unprecedented emergence of a "modern ternary structure" of a new family economy, modern industrial economy, and traditional rural economy in modern China. However, due to the loss of national power and frequent wars, the transformation of old production methods that require the intervention of the state, as well as the comprehensive coordinated development of industry and agriculture in the national economic pattern, have not been completed by the spontaneous efforts of the people. (This article is in Chinese.)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural China
Rural China Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信