Linking land use and forestry transition with depopulation in rural Nepal

M. Poudel, G. Kafle, K. Khanal, S. Dhungana, B. Oli, A. Dhakal, U. Acharya
{"title":"Linking land use and forestry transition with depopulation in rural Nepal","authors":"M. Poudel, G. Kafle, K. Khanal, S. Dhungana, B. Oli, A. Dhakal, U. Acharya","doi":"10.3126/BANKO.V27I3.20558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migration borne depopulation has been emerging as a new dimension of conservation challenges. Existing body of knowledge, however, lack in-depth understanding of this emerging dynamics of depopulation and its forestry implications. Aiming to analyze implications of migration borne land use transition, this study investigated the nature and impacts of migration in rural communities involved in managing community forestry and other tree resources This study was grounded in the experiences and perceptions of community forest users groups in Parbat and Lamjung districts and applied a pragmatic approach to social science, involving the collection of both qualitative and quantitative data. A total of 218 semi-structured interviews, two focus group discussions and three stakeholders’ consultations were conducted. Spatial changes in land use were analyzed using Landsat images of 2000 and 2016 and other existing land use maps.The study found decreasing trend of population growth and identified out-migration of local youth as the main driver. Identified underpinning causes motivating for migration include desire of higher education, employment and resettlement, poverty and poor access to education, markets and other opportunities. This study found negative correlation between migration and farming activities but positive correlation between forest and tree coverage. Forests and other woodland increased but none forest area, most of which were farmlands, decreased. Community forests were getting denser but they lack proper management, abandoned farmlands were turning into bushes, which have increased the risk of forest fire. This study showed very poor understanding of REDD+ and related issues at community level and suggests substantial gaps in policies and procedures to translate migration borne land use transition into opportunities for generating multiple benefits including carbon finance as an additional benefit. Banko JanakariA Journal of Forestry Information for Nepal Special Issue No. 4, 2018, Page: 130-143 ","PeriodicalId":89659,"journal":{"name":"Banko janakari","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/BANKO.V27I3.20558","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banko janakari","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/BANKO.V27I3.20558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Migration borne depopulation has been emerging as a new dimension of conservation challenges. Existing body of knowledge, however, lack in-depth understanding of this emerging dynamics of depopulation and its forestry implications. Aiming to analyze implications of migration borne land use transition, this study investigated the nature and impacts of migration in rural communities involved in managing community forestry and other tree resources This study was grounded in the experiences and perceptions of community forest users groups in Parbat and Lamjung districts and applied a pragmatic approach to social science, involving the collection of both qualitative and quantitative data. A total of 218 semi-structured interviews, two focus group discussions and three stakeholders’ consultations were conducted. Spatial changes in land use were analyzed using Landsat images of 2000 and 2016 and other existing land use maps.The study found decreasing trend of population growth and identified out-migration of local youth as the main driver. Identified underpinning causes motivating for migration include desire of higher education, employment and resettlement, poverty and poor access to education, markets and other opportunities. This study found negative correlation between migration and farming activities but positive correlation between forest and tree coverage. Forests and other woodland increased but none forest area, most of which were farmlands, decreased. Community forests were getting denser but they lack proper management, abandoned farmlands were turning into bushes, which have increased the risk of forest fire. This study showed very poor understanding of REDD+ and related issues at community level and suggests substantial gaps in policies and procedures to translate migration borne land use transition into opportunities for generating multiple benefits including carbon finance as an additional benefit. Banko JanakariA Journal of Forestry Information for Nepal Special Issue No. 4, 2018, Page: 130-143 
将土地利用和林业转型与尼泊尔农村人口减少联系起来
移民导致的人口减少已成为保护挑战的一个新方面。然而,现有的知识体系对这种人口减少的新动态及其对林业的影响缺乏深入的了解。为了分析移民带来的土地利用转型的影响,本研究调查了参与管理社区林业和其他树木资源的农村社区移民的性质和影响。本研究以帕尔巴特和兰井地区社区森林用户群体的经验和看法为基础,采用实用主义的社会科学方法,收集了定性和定量数据。共进行了218次半结构化访谈、两次焦点小组讨论和三次持份者谘询。利用2000年和2016年的Landsat图像以及其他现有的土地利用地图,分析了土地利用的空间变化。研究发现人口增长呈下降趋势,并确定当地青年向外迁移是主要驱动力。已查明的推动移徙的根本原因包括对高等教育、就业和重新安置的渴望、贫困和难以获得教育、市场和其他机会。该研究发现移民与农业活动呈负相关,而森林和树木覆盖率呈正相关。森林和其他林地面积增加,但森林面积没有减少,其中大部分是农田。社区森林越来越密集,但缺乏适当的管理,废弃的农田变成了灌木丛,这增加了森林火灾的风险。该研究表明,在社区层面,对REDD+和相关问题的理解非常贫乏,并表明在将移民带来的土地利用转型转化为产生多种效益的机会(包括碳融资作为额外效益)的政策和程序方面存在巨大差距。《尼泊尔林业信息杂志》2018年第4期,第130-143页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信