The Fox Guarding the Henhouse: Coregulation and Consumer Protection in Food Safety, 1946–2002

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 Q4 BUSINESS
Ashton W. Merck
{"title":"The Fox Guarding the Henhouse: Coregulation and Consumer Protection in Food Safety, 1946–2002","authors":"Ashton W. Merck","doi":"10.1017/eso.2021.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regardless of one’s political persuasion, there are a few basic tasks that most citizens would consider to be “essential” functions of government, and food inspection counts among them. Publicly mandated inspections served various functions over the decades: to prevent fraud and establish confidence in the marketplace, to ensure orderly marketing through quality assessment and grading, and to protect consumers from potentially hazardous or unsafe products. From milk to meat, fertilizer to fruits, inspections of food and other agricultural commodities became a widely accepted—and important—function of governments well before the twentieth century.1 Even in the infamous “America First” budget of 2017, which proposed billions in cuts across a swath of nonmilitary government programs, the Trump administration proposed a “fully funded” Food Safety and Inspection Service at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).2 Food inspectors have worked through government shutdowns and global pandemics; inspection is unquestionably “essential work.” Yet citizens frequently disagree over what inspection should mean, who should carry it out, and how they should accomplish that task. In “The Fox Guarding the Henhouse,” I analyze the prospects and limits of business selfregulation in food safety inspection through a study of the growth and development of the American poultry industry. Drawing on archival records, original field interviews, newspapers, periodicals, and government documents, I show how the debate over how to achieve “safe” and “inspected” chicken influenced not just the laws and regulations but also the organizational structure of firms, the nature of market competition, the trajectory of technological innovations, and even the biology of meat-type chickens. The project also reveals how an emerging system of international trade affected post-1945 developments in U.S. law and policy, and how American business leaders worked alongside regulators to reshape global standards at the turn of the twenty-first century. The dissertation begins in the mid-1950s, when an unlikely coalition of consumer advocates, organized labor, and a nascent poultry industry mobilized their congressional representatives to establish mandatory government inspection of poultry products in interstate commerce. This broad consensus around the need for “government inspection” of food","PeriodicalId":45977,"journal":{"name":"Enterprise & Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"921 - 929"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enterprise & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2021.52","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Regardless of one’s political persuasion, there are a few basic tasks that most citizens would consider to be “essential” functions of government, and food inspection counts among them. Publicly mandated inspections served various functions over the decades: to prevent fraud and establish confidence in the marketplace, to ensure orderly marketing through quality assessment and grading, and to protect consumers from potentially hazardous or unsafe products. From milk to meat, fertilizer to fruits, inspections of food and other agricultural commodities became a widely accepted—and important—function of governments well before the twentieth century.1 Even in the infamous “America First” budget of 2017, which proposed billions in cuts across a swath of nonmilitary government programs, the Trump administration proposed a “fully funded” Food Safety and Inspection Service at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).2 Food inspectors have worked through government shutdowns and global pandemics; inspection is unquestionably “essential work.” Yet citizens frequently disagree over what inspection should mean, who should carry it out, and how they should accomplish that task. In “The Fox Guarding the Henhouse,” I analyze the prospects and limits of business selfregulation in food safety inspection through a study of the growth and development of the American poultry industry. Drawing on archival records, original field interviews, newspapers, periodicals, and government documents, I show how the debate over how to achieve “safe” and “inspected” chicken influenced not just the laws and regulations but also the organizational structure of firms, the nature of market competition, the trajectory of technological innovations, and even the biology of meat-type chickens. The project also reveals how an emerging system of international trade affected post-1945 developments in U.S. law and policy, and how American business leaders worked alongside regulators to reshape global standards at the turn of the twenty-first century. The dissertation begins in the mid-1950s, when an unlikely coalition of consumer advocates, organized labor, and a nascent poultry industry mobilized their congressional representatives to establish mandatory government inspection of poultry products in interstate commerce. This broad consensus around the need for “government inspection” of food
狐狸守鸡舍:1946-2002年食品安全的协调管理和消费者保护
无论一个人的政治信仰如何,大多数公民都会认为有一些基本任务是政府的“基本”职能,食品检查就是其中之一。几十年来,公开授权的检查发挥了各种作用:防止欺诈和建立市场信心,通过质量评估和分级确保有序营销,并保护消费者免受潜在危险或不安全产品的侵害。早在20世纪之前,从牛奶到肉类、化肥到水果,对食品和其他农产品的检查就已经成为政府广泛接受的重要职能。1即使在臭名昭著的2017年“美国优先”预算中,该预算也提议在一系列非军事政府项目中削减数十亿美元,特朗普政府提议在美国农业部(USDA)设立一个“资金充足”的食品安全和检查服务机构。2食品检查员经历了政府关门和全球流行病;毫无疑问,检查是“必不可少的工作”。然而,公民们经常对检查应该意味着什么、谁应该进行检查以及如何完成这项任务意见不一。在《狐狸守护鸡舍》一书中,我通过对美国家禽业增长和发展的研究,分析了食品安全检查中企业自律的前景和局限性。通过档案记录、原始实地采访、报纸、期刊和政府文件,我展示了关于如何实现“安全”和“受检查”的鸡的辩论不仅影响了法律法规,还影响了企业的组织结构、市场竞争的性质、技术创新的轨迹,甚至是肉鸡的生物学。该项目还揭示了新兴的国际贸易体系如何影响1945年后美国法律和政策的发展,以及美国商业领袖如何在21世纪之交与监管机构合作重塑全球标准。这篇论文始于20世纪50年代中期,当时一个由消费者权益倡导者、有组织的劳工和新生的家禽业组成的不太可能的联盟动员了他们的国会代表,要求政府对州际贸易中的家禽产品进行强制性检查。围绕食品“政府检查”的必要性达成的广泛共识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Enterprise & Society offers a forum for research on the historical relations between businesses and their larger political, cultural, institutional, social, and economic contexts. The journal aims to be truly international in scope. Studies focused on individual firms and industries and grounded in a broad historical framework are welcome, as are innovative applications of economic or management theories to business and its context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信