Enthymemes, Doxa, and the Problem of Elided Syllogism

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Ammar Safaa Hussein
{"title":"Enthymemes, Doxa, and the Problem of Elided Syllogism","authors":"Ammar Safaa Hussein","doi":"10.1080/10510974.2023.2200017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The concept of enthymeme has been discussed by rhetoricians and communication scholars. However, researchers have not been able to come to a clear understanding about its meaning, function, and how it works within the rhetorical, persuasive processes. This article identifies the meaning of the concept and explain how enthymemes work. The article also distinguishes the enthymeme from its logical counterpart – syllogism – and explains how its primary source is doxastic, rather than epistemic, knowledge.","PeriodicalId":47080,"journal":{"name":"Communication Studies","volume":"74 1","pages":"268 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2200017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The concept of enthymeme has been discussed by rhetoricians and communication scholars. However, researchers have not been able to come to a clear understanding about its meaning, function, and how it works within the rhetorical, persuasive processes. This article identifies the meaning of the concept and explain how enthymemes work. The article also distinguishes the enthymeme from its logical counterpart – syllogism – and explains how its primary source is doxastic, rather than epistemic, knowledge.
论推理、Doxa和被省略的三段论问题
修辞学家和传播学家一直在讨论“推理meme”的概念。然而,研究人员还不能清楚地了解它的含义、功能,以及它在修辞和说服过程中的作用。本文确定了这个概念的含义,并解释了推理是如何工作的。这篇文章也区分了推理论证和它的逻辑对应物三段论,并解释了它的主要来源是悖论的知识,而不是认识论的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Communication Studies
Communication Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信