Comparative Study of the Snellen iPad App versus Traditional Light Box Snellen Chart in Distance Visual Acuity

Celis Gerald Paul
{"title":"Comparative Study of the Snellen iPad App versus Traditional Light Box Snellen Chart in Distance Visual Acuity","authors":"Celis Gerald Paul","doi":"10.23937/2378-346x/1410146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to the Snellen whether measurements of distance visual acuity using Snellen Chart displayed on iPad tablet is comparable with traditional light-box Snellen Chart among patients in Ophthalmology Outpatient Department by using Snellen iPad application (Eye Chart HD iOS application) as a visual acuity assessment tool. It utilized a cross sectional study design among 100 new patients identified through purposive sampling. Only those who met the criteria (new patients, male or female and aged 8-years-old and above) were included in the study while patients who had a visual acuity of less than 6/30 were not included. Visual acuity was assessed through two testing modalities: (1) The traditional Snellen Light-Box Chart and (2) An iPad Mini 2 with Eye Chart HD iOS application. Findings showed that results of the Snellen iPad application (Eye Chart HD iOS application) and traditional light-box Snellen Chart are comparable with each other. Confounders were also identified such as patient-related factors wherein participants may have memorized the traditional Snellen Chart prior to their eye examination, thereby invalidating the accuracy of the results from the first testing modality employed. Recommendations for future studies include using a larger sample size, exploring the use a paid apps, and controlling the luminous intensity of the iPad Mini 2 and the traditional light-box Snellen Chart to ensure that luminous intensity of each test modality does not affect the validity of the outcome or results of the study.","PeriodicalId":91712,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-346x/1410146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to the Snellen whether measurements of distance visual acuity using Snellen Chart displayed on iPad tablet is comparable with traditional light-box Snellen Chart among patients in Ophthalmology Outpatient Department by using Snellen iPad application (Eye Chart HD iOS application) as a visual acuity assessment tool. It utilized a cross sectional study design among 100 new patients identified through purposive sampling. Only those who met the criteria (new patients, male or female and aged 8-years-old and above) were included in the study while patients who had a visual acuity of less than 6/30 were not included. Visual acuity was assessed through two testing modalities: (1) The traditional Snellen Light-Box Chart and (2) An iPad Mini 2 with Eye Chart HD iOS application. Findings showed that results of the Snellen iPad application (Eye Chart HD iOS application) and traditional light-box Snellen Chart are comparable with each other. Confounders were also identified such as patient-related factors wherein participants may have memorized the traditional Snellen Chart prior to their eye examination, thereby invalidating the accuracy of the results from the first testing modality employed. Recommendations for future studies include using a larger sample size, exploring the use a paid apps, and controlling the luminous intensity of the iPad Mini 2 and the traditional light-box Snellen Chart to ensure that luminous intensity of each test modality does not affect the validity of the outcome or results of the study.
Snellen iPad应用程序与传统灯箱Snellen表远距离视力比较研究
本研究旨在通过使用Snellen iPad应用程序(Eye Chart HD iOS应用程序)作为视力评估工具,对眼科门诊患者使用iPad平板电脑显示的Snellen表测量的距离视力是否与传统灯箱Snellen表相比较。该研究采用了横断面研究设计,通过有目的抽样确定了100名新患者。只有符合标准的患者(新患者,男性或女性,年龄在8岁及以上)被纳入研究,而视力低于6/30的患者不被纳入研究。通过两种测试方式进行视力评估:(1)传统的斯奈伦光盒视障;(2)iPad Mini 2安装HD视障iOS应用程序。研究结果显示,Snellen iPad应用程序(Eye Chart HD iOS应用程序)与传统灯箱Snellen Chart的结果具有可比性。混杂因素也被确定,如患者相关因素,其中参与者可能在他们的眼睛检查之前记住了传统的斯奈伦表,从而使所采用的第一种测试方式的结果的准确性无效。建议未来的研究包括使用更大的样本量,探索付费应用程序的使用,控制iPad Mini 2和传统灯箱Snellen Chart的发光强度,以确保每种测试方式的发光强度不影响结果的有效性或研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信