Ultrasound in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: What? When? How? Why? Who?

Saika Amreen
{"title":"Ultrasound in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: What? When? How? Why? Who?","authors":"Saika Amreen","doi":"10.33590/emjradiol/22-00058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of the ovarian morphology is one of the most commonly performed ultrasound examinations. Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a multifactorial, multifaceted, polygenic disorder with varying phenotypes. It defines a labyrinthine symptomatology including menstrual cycle irregularities, hormonal imbalance, and metabolic disturbance. Historically, this syndrome has been diagnosed clinically with supportive lab parameters. However, the role of ultrasound has mutated from identifying, to mis-defining and finally to re-classifying PCOS. At present it seems that the ultrasound identification of the ‘string of pearls’ has cemented this disease with a misleading name. A supposed increase in the detection of polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasound has been accredited to advances in technology allowing better visualisation of the ovaries/stroma/follicles by higher frequency probes with the possibility of endovaginal imaging. Nevertheless, there is a disparity in what the ultrasound shows, how the clinician interprets the report, and what the patient understands about her diagnosis. Identification of the multifollicular ovary is still quite frequently ascribed to PCOS, while ovarian ultrasound remains ambiguous to the different phenotype of PCOS. Whether morphological disparities represent a normal variation in ovarian anatomy or true precursors of PCOS remains debatable. The absence of definition of a ‘normal’ ovary with respect to volume and follicular number, makes the diagnosis of PCOS more challenging.","PeriodicalId":93747,"journal":{"name":"EMJ. Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ. Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjradiol/22-00058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of the ovarian morphology is one of the most commonly performed ultrasound examinations. Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a multifactorial, multifaceted, polygenic disorder with varying phenotypes. It defines a labyrinthine symptomatology including menstrual cycle irregularities, hormonal imbalance, and metabolic disturbance. Historically, this syndrome has been diagnosed clinically with supportive lab parameters. However, the role of ultrasound has mutated from identifying, to mis-defining and finally to re-classifying PCOS. At present it seems that the ultrasound identification of the ‘string of pearls’ has cemented this disease with a misleading name. A supposed increase in the detection of polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasound has been accredited to advances in technology allowing better visualisation of the ovaries/stroma/follicles by higher frequency probes with the possibility of endovaginal imaging. Nevertheless, there is a disparity in what the ultrasound shows, how the clinician interprets the report, and what the patient understands about her diagnosis. Identification of the multifollicular ovary is still quite frequently ascribed to PCOS, while ovarian ultrasound remains ambiguous to the different phenotype of PCOS. Whether morphological disparities represent a normal variation in ovarian anatomy or true precursors of PCOS remains debatable. The absence of definition of a ‘normal’ ovary with respect to volume and follicular number, makes the diagnosis of PCOS more challenging.
多囊卵巢综合征的超声检查:什么?什么时候怎样为什么?谁
卵巢形态评估是最常见的超声检查之一。多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是一种多因素、多方面、多基因的疾病,具有不同的表型。它定义了一种错综复杂的症状,包括月经周期不规律、激素失衡和代谢紊乱。从历史上看,这种综合征是通过支持性实验室参数进行临床诊断的。然而,超声的作用已经从识别、错误定义到最终重新分类多囊卵巢综合征。目前看来,超声波对“珍珠串”的识别已经用一个误导性的名字巩固了这种疾病。超声对多囊卵巢形态检测的增加被认为是技术的进步,通过更高频率的探头可以更好地观察卵巢/基质/卵泡,并有可能进行阴道内成像。然而,在超声波显示的内容、临床医生如何解释报告以及患者对诊断的理解方面存在差异。多滤泡性卵巢的鉴定仍然经常被归因于多囊卵巢综合征,而卵巢超声对多囊卵巢综合症的不同表型仍然不明确。形态学差异是否代表卵巢解剖结构的正常变化或多囊卵巢综合征的真正前兆仍有争议。缺乏关于“正常”卵巢体积和卵泡数量的定义,使多囊卵巢综合征的诊断更具挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信