The Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: Opportunities and challenges in the eastern United States

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jonathan M. Duncan, Zachary Respess, William Ryan, Robert Austin, Matthew Royer, Deanna Osmond, Peter Kleinman
{"title":"The Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: Opportunities and challenges in the eastern United States","authors":"Jonathan M. Duncan,&nbsp;Zachary Respess,&nbsp;William Ryan,&nbsp;Robert Austin,&nbsp;Matthew Royer,&nbsp;Deanna Osmond,&nbsp;Peter Kleinman","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Agriculture Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) applies high-spatial resolution soils and topographic data, now available for many areas of the United States, to precisely locate opportunities for the placement of conservation practices in agricultural watersheds. Application of the ACPF, developed in midwestern landscapes, to watersheds in the eastern United States represents both opportunity and challenge to conservation planning. Based on experience in applying ACPF to eight watersheds in the eastern United States, from Vermont to North Carolina, we assess the toolbox's application in the eastern United States through the lens of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis framework. We see a great future for the ACPF, but its adoption and utility require interaction with scientists and conservation planners familiar with the region to avoid misapplication and ensure appropriate adaptation and interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ael2.20054","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Agriculture Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) applies high-spatial resolution soils and topographic data, now available for many areas of the United States, to precisely locate opportunities for the placement of conservation practices in agricultural watersheds. Application of the ACPF, developed in midwestern landscapes, to watersheds in the eastern United States represents both opportunity and challenge to conservation planning. Based on experience in applying ACPF to eight watersheds in the eastern United States, from Vermont to North Carolina, we assess the toolbox's application in the eastern United States through the lens of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis framework. We see a great future for the ACPF, but its adoption and utility require interaction with scientists and conservation planners familiar with the region to avoid misapplication and ensure appropriate adaptation and interpretation.

Abstract Image

农业保护规划框架:美国东部的机遇与挑战
农业保护规划框架(ACPF)应用高空间分辨率的土壤和地形数据,现在可用于美国的许多地区,以精确定位在农业流域实施保护措施的机会。在中西部地区开发的ACPF在美国东部流域的应用对保护规划来说既是机遇也是挑战。根据ACPF在美国东部八个流域(从佛蒙特州到北卡罗来纳州)的应用经验,我们通过优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)分析框架来评估工具箱在美国东部的应用情况。我们看到了ACPF的美好未来,但它的采用和使用需要与熟悉该地区的科学家和保护规划者进行互动,以避免误用,并确保适当的适应和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信