Reflections on Race and Ethnicity in North Africa Towards a Conceptual Critique of the Arab–Berber Divide

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Mohamad Amer Meziane
{"title":"Reflections on Race and Ethnicity in North Africa Towards a Conceptual Critique of the Arab–Berber Divide","authors":"Mohamad Amer Meziane","doi":"10.1017/rms.2021.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay argues that the usages of the divide between Berbers and Arabs by the Algerian government and Berber activists alike should be analyzed in light of the transformation of the Imazighen into a cultural minority by the nation-state. The nation-state's definition of the majority as Arab, as well as the very concept of a minority, has shaped both the status and the grammar of the Arab-Berber divide in ways that are irreducible to how this binary functioned under French colonialism. In order to understand the distinct modes by which these categories function in Algeria today, one needs to analyze how the language of the nation-state determines their grammar, namely how they are deployed within this political context. Hence, by focusing primarily on French colonial representations of race such as the Kabyle Myth and by asserting simplified colonial continuities, the literature fails to make sense of the political centrality of the nation-state in the construction of the Amazigh question.","PeriodicalId":21066,"journal":{"name":"Review of Middle East Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/rms.2021.24","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Middle East Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2021.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This essay argues that the usages of the divide between Berbers and Arabs by the Algerian government and Berber activists alike should be analyzed in light of the transformation of the Imazighen into a cultural minority by the nation-state. The nation-state's definition of the majority as Arab, as well as the very concept of a minority, has shaped both the status and the grammar of the Arab-Berber divide in ways that are irreducible to how this binary functioned under French colonialism. In order to understand the distinct modes by which these categories function in Algeria today, one needs to analyze how the language of the nation-state determines their grammar, namely how they are deployed within this political context. Hence, by focusing primarily on French colonial representations of race such as the Kabyle Myth and by asserting simplified colonial continuities, the literature fails to make sense of the political centrality of the nation-state in the construction of the Amazigh question.
对北非种族和民族的思考——对阿拉伯-柏柏尔分裂的概念批判
摘要本文认为,阿尔及利亚政府和柏柏尔活动人士对柏柏尔人和阿拉伯人之间的区分的用法应该结合民族国家将伊马齐根人转变为文化少数民族的情况来分析。民族国家将多数人定义为阿拉伯人,以及少数人的概念,塑造了阿拉伯人和柏柏尔人的地位和语法,其方式无法简化为这种二元结构在法国殖民主义下的运作方式。为了理解这些类别在阿尔及利亚今天发挥作用的不同模式,人们需要分析民族国家的语言如何决定它们的语法,即它们如何在这种政治背景下被部署。因此,通过主要关注法国殖民对种族的表现,如卡比尔神话,以及通过断言简化的殖民连续性,这些文献未能在构建阿马齐格问题时理解民族国家的政治中心地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信