Perceived and one’s own motion in response priming

C. Bermeitinger, R. Hackländer, Marie Kollek, Matthis Stiegemeyer, Alexandra E. Tränkner
{"title":"Perceived and one’s own motion in response priming","authors":"C. Bermeitinger, R. Hackländer, Marie Kollek, Matthis Stiegemeyer, Alexandra E. Tränkner","doi":"10.1515/psych-2020-0106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In response priming, motor pre-activations from a prime to the response to a target can be measured, as a function of whether they require the same (compatible) or different (incompatible) responses. With moving primes and static arrow targets, the results depend on the stimulus onset asynchrony between prime and target: with short SOAs, there were faster responses to compatible than incompatible targets, with longer SOAs, the pattern reverses. However, this reversal was not found with more biological motions. The current study comprised 3 experiments in order to replicate several findings from previous research and add evidence regarding the interplay of one’s own and perceived motions. Subjects performed a response priming task with moving prime stimuli while in motion themselves. With this paradigm, we tested the general influence of motion on responding and compatibility effects in response priming with moving prime stimuli. Furthermore, we assessed specific interactions of features of the perceived stimuli (e.g., moving vs. static; direction of the prime or target) and the own motion (e.g., walking vs. standing; direction of being rotated). We used two different own motions (walking on a treadmill, Exp. 1 & 3; rotating in a human gyroscope, Exp. 2) and two different visual stimulus types (rows-of-dots, Exp. 1 & 2; point light displays, Exp. 3). Compatibility effects were, in general, neither increased nor decreased during motion. Their size depended on the stimulus type, the velocity of one’s own motion, and several interactions of perceived and own motion. We discuss our findings with respect to perception-action interactions and previous findings on response priming with moving prime stimuli.","PeriodicalId":74357,"journal":{"name":"Open psychology","volume":"2 1","pages":"213 - 237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/psych-2020-0106","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In response priming, motor pre-activations from a prime to the response to a target can be measured, as a function of whether they require the same (compatible) or different (incompatible) responses. With moving primes and static arrow targets, the results depend on the stimulus onset asynchrony between prime and target: with short SOAs, there were faster responses to compatible than incompatible targets, with longer SOAs, the pattern reverses. However, this reversal was not found with more biological motions. The current study comprised 3 experiments in order to replicate several findings from previous research and add evidence regarding the interplay of one’s own and perceived motions. Subjects performed a response priming task with moving prime stimuli while in motion themselves. With this paradigm, we tested the general influence of motion on responding and compatibility effects in response priming with moving prime stimuli. Furthermore, we assessed specific interactions of features of the perceived stimuli (e.g., moving vs. static; direction of the prime or target) and the own motion (e.g., walking vs. standing; direction of being rotated). We used two different own motions (walking on a treadmill, Exp. 1 & 3; rotating in a human gyroscope, Exp. 2) and two different visual stimulus types (rows-of-dots, Exp. 1 & 2; point light displays, Exp. 3). Compatibility effects were, in general, neither increased nor decreased during motion. Their size depended on the stimulus type, the velocity of one’s own motion, and several interactions of perceived and own motion. We discuss our findings with respect to perception-action interactions and previous findings on response priming with moving prime stimuli.
反应启动时感知到的和自己的动作
摘要在反应启动中,可以测量从启动到对目标的反应的运动预激活,作为它们需要相同(兼容)还是不同(不兼容)反应的函数。对于移动素数和静态箭头目标,结果取决于素数和目标之间的刺激开始异步性:对于短SOA,对兼容目标的响应比不兼容目标更快,对于长SOA,模式相反。然而,这种逆转并没有在更多的生物运动中发现。目前的研究包括3个实验,目的是复制之前研究的一些发现,并增加关于自己和感知运动相互作用的证据。受试者在自己运动的同时,用移动的主要刺激进行反应启动任务。利用这一范式,我们测试了运动对反应的一般影响,以及反应启动与运动启动刺激的相容性效应。此外,我们评估了感知刺激特征(例如,移动与静止;素数或目标的方向)和自身运动(例如,行走与站立;旋转的方向)的具体相互作用。我们使用了两种不同的自身运动(在跑步机上行走,实验1&3;在人类陀螺仪中旋转,实验2)和两种不同类型的视觉刺激(点行,实验1&2;点光源显示,实验3)。一般来说,在运动过程中,相容性效应既没有增加也没有减少。它们的大小取决于刺激类型、自身运动的速度以及感知和自身运动的几种相互作用。我们讨论了我们关于感知-动作相互作用的发现,以及之前关于运动主刺激的反应启动的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信