{"title":"Lorraine Noir: Didier Daeninckx and the writing of deindustrialization","authors":"T. Raboin","doi":"10.3828/cfc.2020.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ENG) This article studies Didier Daeninckx as a writer of deindustrialization. In the novel PlayBack (1986) and in short stories such as “Traverse no 28” (1998), he weaves a multifaceted critique of France as haunted by its industrial past. Daeninckx’s first tool is to write a noir history of deindustrialization, thus producing a subaltern history of Lorraine. Reflecting on the uses of memory (and of his own work in that regard), Daeninckx also writes a criticism of the nascent business of industrial heritage. Finally, this article appraises Daeninckx’s critique by examining his writing’s nostalgia for a lost industrial world, as well and its denunciation of post-industrial subjectivations.","PeriodicalId":53563,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary French Civilization","volume":"45 1","pages":"211-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary French Civilization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/cfc.2020.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ENG) This article studies Didier Daeninckx as a writer of deindustrialization. In the novel PlayBack (1986) and in short stories such as “Traverse no 28” (1998), he weaves a multifaceted critique of France as haunted by its industrial past. Daeninckx’s first tool is to write a noir history of deindustrialization, thus producing a subaltern history of Lorraine. Reflecting on the uses of memory (and of his own work in that regard), Daeninckx also writes a criticism of the nascent business of industrial heritage. Finally, this article appraises Daeninckx’s critique by examining his writing’s nostalgia for a lost industrial world, as well and its denunciation of post-industrial subjectivations.