Infection or affection: physical literacy and the reterritorialisation of the HPE curriculum

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Ovens, Eimear Enright
{"title":"Infection or affection: physical literacy and the reterritorialisation of the HPE curriculum","authors":"A. Ovens, Eimear Enright","doi":"10.1080/25742981.2021.1936582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Physical literacy has quickly become established within the broad fields of Sport, Health and Physical Education as a set of capabilities and dispositions that enable active participation in movement cultures across an individual’s lifespan. In that sense, it has become a powerful concept in terms of being a desirable outcome of education programmes for young people in all spheres of their life as well as being a powerful discourse for sport and physical activity policy for all sectors of the community. Given this, the question arises as to its relationship with physical education, as a curriculum practice in schools. In this introduction to the special edition, we propose that the theoretical tools of assemblage and territorialisation provide a way to theorise curriculum and understand how the papers might be read with a sense of coherence. We conclude by suggesting that less focus needs to be paid to defining the essence and nature of physical literacy, and more attention given to how it potentially narrows the curriculum and more questioning of whose interests are being served by advocating for its uptake in HPE.","PeriodicalId":36887,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"96 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/25742981.2021.1936582","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2021.1936582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Physical literacy has quickly become established within the broad fields of Sport, Health and Physical Education as a set of capabilities and dispositions that enable active participation in movement cultures across an individual’s lifespan. In that sense, it has become a powerful concept in terms of being a desirable outcome of education programmes for young people in all spheres of their life as well as being a powerful discourse for sport and physical activity policy for all sectors of the community. Given this, the question arises as to its relationship with physical education, as a curriculum practice in schools. In this introduction to the special edition, we propose that the theoretical tools of assemblage and territorialisation provide a way to theorise curriculum and understand how the papers might be read with a sense of coherence. We conclude by suggesting that less focus needs to be paid to defining the essence and nature of physical literacy, and more attention given to how it potentially narrows the curriculum and more questioning of whose interests are being served by advocating for its uptake in HPE.
感染还是情感:体育素养与HPE课程的再教育
摘要:体育素养在体育、健康和体育教育的广泛领域中迅速建立起来,作为一套能力和倾向,使个人能够在一生中积极参与运动文化。从这个意义上说,它已成为一个强有力的概念,成为年轻人生活各个领域教育方案的理想成果,也是社会各阶层体育和体育活动政策的有力话语。考虑到这一点,它与体育教育的关系就产生了问题,体育教育是学校的一种课程实践。在特别版的引言中,我们提出集合和地域化的理论工具为课程理论化和理解如何连贯地阅读论文提供了一种方法。最后,我们建议,需要减少对定义体育素养的本质和性质的关注,更多地关注体育素养如何潜在地缩小课程范围,并更多地质疑通过倡导在HPE中吸收体育素养来满足谁的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信