Exploring the Psychosocial Consequences of Mandatory Quarantine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong

J. Blaine
{"title":"Exploring the Psychosocial Consequences of Mandatory Quarantine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong","authors":"J. Blaine","doi":"10.11648/J.PBS.20211002.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: While global media and local & international health organisations provide regularly updated information and statistics on the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths, little is known of the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 quarantine. Quarantine measures during pandemics such as COVID-19 present complex challenges. Determining equitable and effective application of policies is difficult, particularly concerning associated mental health effects. Recent research suggests that as most of the adverse psychological outcomes result from longer quarantine duration and the restriction of liberty, policy makers should consider voluntary quarantine, emphasising altruistic reasons for self-isolating. Having a sense of altruism could mitigate the mental health consequences of quarantine. Objective: The aim of this study was to understand the psychosocial consequences of mandatory quarantine in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: An exploratory qualitative research design was employed. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and surveys were analysed using template analysis. Findings: Employing the acronym ALTRUISM, the findings suggest that mandatory quarantine was associated with negative psychosocial consequences, some of which were long-lasting. The findings suggest that relying on altruism and not enforcing quarantine could alleviate the mental health issues associated with quarantine. Additionally, psychological support should be made available for people during and after quarantine. Implications: The importance of the contribution of this study to public health policy and practice in Hong Kong and internationally is discussed, with recommendations for future research and practical implications of the findings.","PeriodicalId":93047,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and behavioral sciences (New York, N.Y. 2012)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and behavioral sciences (New York, N.Y. 2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.PBS.20211002.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: While global media and local & international health organisations provide regularly updated information and statistics on the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths, little is known of the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 quarantine. Quarantine measures during pandemics such as COVID-19 present complex challenges. Determining equitable and effective application of policies is difficult, particularly concerning associated mental health effects. Recent research suggests that as most of the adverse psychological outcomes result from longer quarantine duration and the restriction of liberty, policy makers should consider voluntary quarantine, emphasising altruistic reasons for self-isolating. Having a sense of altruism could mitigate the mental health consequences of quarantine. Objective: The aim of this study was to understand the psychosocial consequences of mandatory quarantine in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: An exploratory qualitative research design was employed. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and surveys were analysed using template analysis. Findings: Employing the acronym ALTRUISM, the findings suggest that mandatory quarantine was associated with negative psychosocial consequences, some of which were long-lasting. The findings suggest that relying on altruism and not enforcing quarantine could alleviate the mental health issues associated with quarantine. Additionally, psychological support should be made available for people during and after quarantine. Implications: The importance of the contribution of this study to public health policy and practice in Hong Kong and internationally is discussed, with recommendations for future research and practical implications of the findings.
探讨香港COVID-19大流行期间强制隔离的社会心理后果
背景:虽然全球媒体以及地方和国际卫生组织定期提供有关COVID-19病例和死亡人数的最新信息和统计数据,但人们对COVID-19隔离的社会心理影响知之甚少。COVID-19等大流行期间的隔离措施带来了复杂的挑战。确定公平和有效地实施政策是困难的,特别是在相关的心理健康影响方面。最近的研究表明,由于大多数不良心理后果是由于较长的隔离时间和对自由的限制,政策制定者应考虑自愿隔离,强调自我隔离的利他原因。有一种利他主义意识可以减轻隔离对心理健康的影响。目的:本研究旨在了解COVID-19大流行期间香港强制隔离的社会心理后果。方法:采用探索性质的研究设计。采用模板分析对半结构化访谈和调查的定性数据进行分析。研究结果:采用首字母缩略词利他主义,研究结果表明,强制性隔离与负面的社会心理后果有关,其中一些后果是长期的。研究结果表明,依靠利他主义而不是强制隔离可以缓解与隔离相关的心理健康问题。此外,应在隔离期间和隔离后为人们提供心理支持。启示:本研究讨论了对香港和国际公共卫生政策和实践的重要贡献,并就未来的研究提出建议,以及研究结果的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信