The trail less traveled: Analytical approach for creating shortened versions for virtual reality-based color trails test.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-06 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2065204
Meytal Wilf, Noa Ben Yair, W Geoffrey Wright, Meir Plotnik
{"title":"The trail less traveled: Analytical approach for creating shortened versions for virtual reality-based color trails test.","authors":"Meytal Wilf, Noa Ben Yair, W Geoffrey Wright, Meir Plotnik","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2065204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Color Trails Test (\"CTT\") is among the most popular neuropsychological assessment tests of executive function, targeting sustained visual attention (Trails A), and divided attention (Trails B). During the pen-and-paper (P&P) test, the participant traces 25 consecutive numbered targets marked on a page, and the completion time is recorded. In many cases, multiple assessments are performed on the same individual, either under varying experimental conditions or at several timepoints. However, repeated testing often results in learning and fatigue effects, which confound test outcomes. To mitigate these effects, we set the grounds for developing shorter versions of the CTT (<25 targets), using virtual reality (VR) based CTT (VR-CTT). Our aim was to discover the minimal set of targets that is sufficient for maintaining concurrent validity with the CTT including differentiation between age groups, and the difference between Trails A and B. To this aim, healthy participants in three age groups (total <i>N</i> = 165; young, middle-aged, or older adults) performed both the P&P CTT, and one type of VR-CTT (immersive head-mounted-device VR, large-scale 3D VR, or tablet). A subset of 13 targets was highly correlated with overall task completion times in all age groups and platforms (<i>r</i> > 0.8). We tested construct validity and found that the shortened-CTT preserved differences between Trails A and B (<i>p</i> < 0.001), showed concurrent validity relative to the P&P scores (<i>r</i> > 0.5; <i>p</i> < 0.05), and differentiated between age groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These findings open the possibility for shortened \"CTT-versions\", to be used in repeated-measures experiments or longitudinal studies, with potential implications for shortening neurocognitive assessment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2065204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Color Trails Test ("CTT") is among the most popular neuropsychological assessment tests of executive function, targeting sustained visual attention (Trails A), and divided attention (Trails B). During the pen-and-paper (P&P) test, the participant traces 25 consecutive numbered targets marked on a page, and the completion time is recorded. In many cases, multiple assessments are performed on the same individual, either under varying experimental conditions or at several timepoints. However, repeated testing often results in learning and fatigue effects, which confound test outcomes. To mitigate these effects, we set the grounds for developing shorter versions of the CTT (<25 targets), using virtual reality (VR) based CTT (VR-CTT). Our aim was to discover the minimal set of targets that is sufficient for maintaining concurrent validity with the CTT including differentiation between age groups, and the difference between Trails A and B. To this aim, healthy participants in three age groups (total N = 165; young, middle-aged, or older adults) performed both the P&P CTT, and one type of VR-CTT (immersive head-mounted-device VR, large-scale 3D VR, or tablet). A subset of 13 targets was highly correlated with overall task completion times in all age groups and platforms (r > 0.8). We tested construct validity and found that the shortened-CTT preserved differences between Trails A and B (p < 0.001), showed concurrent validity relative to the P&P scores (r > 0.5; p < 0.05), and differentiated between age groups (p < 0.05). These findings open the possibility for shortened "CTT-versions", to be used in repeated-measures experiments or longitudinal studies, with potential implications for shortening neurocognitive assessment protocols.

少走的轨迹:为基于虚拟现实的颜色轨迹测试创建缩短版本的分析方法。
颜色轨迹测试(“CTT”)是最受欢迎的执行功能、针对持续视觉注意力(轨迹A)和分散注意力(轨迹B)的神经心理学评估测试之一。在纸笔(P&P)测试中,参与者追踪一页上标记的25个连续编号的目标,并记录完成时间。在许多情况下,在不同的实验条件下或在几个时间点对同一个人进行多次评估。然而,重复测试往往会导致学习和疲劳效应,这会混淆测试结果。为了减轻这些影响,我们为开发较短版本的CTT奠定了基础( 0.8)。我们测试了结构的有效性,发现缩短的CTT保留了轨迹A和轨迹B之间的差异(p  0.5;p < 0.05),并且在不同年龄组之间有差异(p < 0.05)。这些发现为缩短“CTT版本”提供了可能性,可用于重复测量实验或纵向研究,对缩短神经认知评估方案具有潜在意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信