E. Szívós, J. Surman, J. Benes, Mladen Medved, T. Scheer, Maureen Healy, P. Judson
{"title":"Debate on Pieter M. Judson’s The Habsburg Empire: A New History","authors":"E. Szívós, J. Surman, J. Benes, Mladen Medved, T. Scheer, Maureen Healy, P. Judson","doi":"10.1163/18763308-04602009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its publication, Pieter M. Judson’s history of the Habsburg Empire: A New History has sparked discussion and debate as a result of its novel reframing of the relationship between nationalism and empire in the Central European polity. Judson offers a new narrative of a vibrant and adaptive state that had the ability to balance empire and nationality, and thus was not doomed to fail, as has been one of the well-worn interpretations of the empire. The contributors to this debate come to the book from different regional and academic standpoints, and take on a number of key issues raised by the book: the role of nationality in the empire; the nature of Habsburg imperial rule within the broader context of European empire building; the relationship of Hungary within the larger empire; and the position of the Habsburg Empire within European history as a whole. Together, these perspectives shed light on core issues raised by the book as well as offer reflections on the future of Habsburg studies.","PeriodicalId":40651,"journal":{"name":"East Central Europe","volume":"46 1","pages":"343-384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18763308-04602009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18763308-04602009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since its publication, Pieter M. Judson’s history of the Habsburg Empire: A New History has sparked discussion and debate as a result of its novel reframing of the relationship between nationalism and empire in the Central European polity. Judson offers a new narrative of a vibrant and adaptive state that had the ability to balance empire and nationality, and thus was not doomed to fail, as has been one of the well-worn interpretations of the empire. The contributors to this debate come to the book from different regional and academic standpoints, and take on a number of key issues raised by the book: the role of nationality in the empire; the nature of Habsburg imperial rule within the broader context of European empire building; the relationship of Hungary within the larger empire; and the position of the Habsburg Empire within European history as a whole. Together, these perspectives shed light on core issues raised by the book as well as offer reflections on the future of Habsburg studies.
彼得·贾德森(Pieter M. Judson)的《哈布斯堡帝国的历史:一种新的历史》(Habsburg Empire history: A New history)一书出版以来,由于其对中欧政治中民族主义与帝国之间关系的新颖重构,引发了讨论和辩论。贾德森提供了一个充满活力和适应性的国家的新叙述,它有能力平衡帝国和民族,因此不会注定失败,就像对帝国的一种老生常谈的解释一样。这场辩论的贡献者来自不同的地区和学术立场,并采取了书中提出的一些关键问题:民族在帝国中的作用;哈布斯堡帝国统治在欧洲帝国建设的大背景下的本质;匈牙利在大帝国内部的关系;以及哈布斯堡帝国在整个欧洲历史中的地位。总之,这些观点阐明了书中提出的核心问题,并对哈布斯堡研究的未来提供了反思。