Características Proximales de Intentos Autolíticos: Estudio en un Hospital Público de España

Q3 Medicine
María Teresa Rosique-Sanz , Laura Broco-Villahoz , Rebeca Domínguez-Alhambra , Cristina Fernández-Carpio , Carmen Aldara Carrajo-García , Cristina Polo-Usaola
{"title":"Características Proximales de Intentos Autolíticos: Estudio en un Hospital Público de España","authors":"María Teresa Rosique-Sanz ,&nbsp;Laura Broco-Villahoz ,&nbsp;Rebeca Domínguez-Alhambra ,&nbsp;Cristina Fernández-Carpio ,&nbsp;Carmen Aldara Carrajo-García ,&nbsp;Cristina Polo-Usaola","doi":"10.1016/j.rcp.2022.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Different parameters of suicide attempts treated since the implementation of the Attention to Suicide Risk Program (ARSUIC) in 2012 at the Hospital Ramón y Cajal in Madrid Region are described in this paper.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The sample was composed of 107 patients and the information was collected through a questionnaire created <em>ad hoc</em> with the following variables: type of suicidal ideation; drug use immediately prior to the attempt; method (in case of drug overdosing: drug/s used); location; accessibility to rescue; planning; intentionality; criticism; and brakes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Descriptive statistics were obtained and a comparison by gender was made through the χ<sup>2</sup> and contingency coefficients tests. The data from the retrospective longitudinal study showed that the most common profile was of patients with unstructured ideas of death and no previous drug use who took an unplanned drug overdose in the family home, with the intention of self-harm or avoidance of discomfort, especially with benzodiazepines. Patients tend to ask for help afterwards and criticise the attempt, but potential restraints are often not recorded in the clinical report. Regarding the dissimilarities based on gender, statistically significant differences were found in prior alcohol consumption, in favour of men and in the overdose method, specifically with benzodiazepines, in favour of women.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Knowing the types of attempts at self-harm is essential for improving prevention, understanding and patient management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52477,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 158-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034745022000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Different parameters of suicide attempts treated since the implementation of the Attention to Suicide Risk Program (ARSUIC) in 2012 at the Hospital Ramón y Cajal in Madrid Region are described in this paper.

Method

The sample was composed of 107 patients and the information was collected through a questionnaire created ad hoc with the following variables: type of suicidal ideation; drug use immediately prior to the attempt; method (in case of drug overdosing: drug/s used); location; accessibility to rescue; planning; intentionality; criticism; and brakes.

Results

Descriptive statistics were obtained and a comparison by gender was made through the χ2 and contingency coefficients tests. The data from the retrospective longitudinal study showed that the most common profile was of patients with unstructured ideas of death and no previous drug use who took an unplanned drug overdose in the family home, with the intention of self-harm or avoidance of discomfort, especially with benzodiazepines. Patients tend to ask for help afterwards and criticise the attempt, but potential restraints are often not recorded in the clinical report. Regarding the dissimilarities based on gender, statistically significant differences were found in prior alcohol consumption, in favour of men and in the overdose method, specifically with benzodiazepines, in favour of women.

Conclusions

Knowing the types of attempts at self-harm is essential for improving prevention, understanding and patient management.

自治尝试的近端特征:西班牙一家公立医院的研究
导言本文介绍了马德里大区拉蒙-伊-卡哈尔医院自2012年实施关注自杀风险计划(ARSUIC)以来所治疗的自杀未遂患者的不同参数。方法样本由107名患者组成,通过一份临时制作的调查问卷收集信息,其中包含以下变量:自杀意念类型;自杀未遂前的药物使用情况;自杀方法(药物过量情况下:使用的药物);地点;获得救援的可能性;计划性;意向性;批评;以及刹车。结果通过χ2和或然系数检验获得了描述性统计数字,并按性别进行了比较。回顾性纵向研究的数据显示,最常见的情况是患者对死亡的想法不明确,以前没有使用过药物,在家中意外服用过量药物,目的是自残或避免不适,尤其是使用苯二氮卓类药物。患者往往会在事后寻求帮助,并对企图进行批评,但临床报告中往往没有记录潜在的限制因素。关于基于性别的差异,在统计学上发现,之前饮酒的男性和使用过量方法(尤其是苯二氮卓类药物)的女性有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatria Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría (RCP) is a quarterly official publication of Colombian Psychiatry Association (March, June, September and December) and its purpose is to spread different the knowledge models that currently constitute the theoretical and practical body of our specialty. Psychiatrists, psychiatric residents, non psychiatric physicians, psychologists, philosophers or other health professionals or persons interested in this area can take part in the magazine. This journal publishes original works, revision or updating articles, case reports of all psychiatry and mental health areas, epistemology, mind philosophy, bioethics and also articles about methodology of investigation and critical reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信