“Family 500+” programme as a social investment aimed at increasing the number of births in Poland – an analysis of Internet forums discourse

P. Michoń
{"title":"“Family 500+” programme as a social investment aimed at increasing the number of births in Poland – an analysis of Internet forums discourse","authors":"P. Michoń","doi":"10.33119/sd.2021.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is to identify discourses related to the pro-natalist goal of the “Family 500 plus” programme, which is the largest family cash benefit scheme ever introduced in Poland. The paper presents an analysis of the conventional discourse based on Internet forums devoted to this programme. The analysis of 47 forums and over 3,000 posts shared between November 2015 and June 2019 allowed the author to distinguish fourteen dominant conventional discourses which were classified into three groups labelled as follows: (1) discourses of the state’s/individuals’ responsibility (2) discourses concerning policy making (3) discourses of (in)efficiency and (in)effectiveness. The research also indicates the leading role of the social perception of parents-beneficiaries in the debate on the “Family 500+” programme. The key to gaining social support, and, more broadly, for the legitimation of the welfare state in Poland, seems to care for a positive image of parents eligible for the benefit. The paper reveals complexity and interdependence of arguments concerning chances of the programme in terms of supporting increases in fertility in Poland. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first attempt to analyse online forums in terms of social policy instruments.","PeriodicalId":85596,"journal":{"name":"Studia demograficzne","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia demograficzne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33119/sd.2021.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to identify discourses related to the pro-natalist goal of the “Family 500 plus” programme, which is the largest family cash benefit scheme ever introduced in Poland. The paper presents an analysis of the conventional discourse based on Internet forums devoted to this programme. The analysis of 47 forums and over 3,000 posts shared between November 2015 and June 2019 allowed the author to distinguish fourteen dominant conventional discourses which were classified into three groups labelled as follows: (1) discourses of the state’s/individuals’ responsibility (2) discourses concerning policy making (3) discourses of (in)efficiency and (in)effectiveness. The research also indicates the leading role of the social perception of parents-beneficiaries in the debate on the “Family 500+” programme. The key to gaining social support, and, more broadly, for the legitimation of the welfare state in Poland, seems to care for a positive image of parents eligible for the benefit. The paper reveals complexity and interdependence of arguments concerning chances of the programme in terms of supporting increases in fertility in Poland. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this paper is the first attempt to analyse online forums in terms of social policy instruments.
“家庭500+”计划作为一项社会投资,旨在增加波兰的出生人数-对互联网论坛话语的分析
本文的目的是确定与“家庭500 +”方案的亲生育目标有关的话语,该方案是波兰有史以来引入的最大的家庭现金福利计划。本文以网络论坛为基础,对该项目的传统讨论进行了分析。通过对2015年11月至2019年6月期间分享的47个论坛和3000多个帖子的分析,作者区分了14个占主导地位的传统话语,这些话语被分为三组,分别是:(1)国家/个人责任的话语(2)有关政策制定的话语(3)效率和有效性的话语。该研究还表明,在“家庭500+”计划的辩论中,父母受益者的社会观念起着主导作用。获得社会支持的关键,更广泛地说,是波兰福利国家合法化的关键,似乎是关心有资格获得福利的父母的正面形象。该文件揭示了关于该方案在支持波兰生育率提高方面的可能性的复杂性和相互依赖性。就笔者所知,本文是第一次尝试从社会政策工具的角度来分析网络论坛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信