Computational analysis of crosstalk between transcriptional regulators and RNA-binding proteins suggests mutual regulation of polycomb proteins and SRSF1 influencing adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

M J Nishanth, Shanker Jha
{"title":"Computational analysis of crosstalk between transcriptional regulators and RNA-binding proteins suggests mutual regulation of polycomb proteins and SRSF1 influencing adult hippocampal neurogenesis.","authors":"M J Nishanth,&nbsp;Shanker Jha","doi":"10.1007/s44192-023-00034-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) is a clinically significant neural phenomenon. Understanding its molecular regulation would be important. In this regard, most studies have focused on transcriptional regulators (TRs), epigenetic modifiers, or non-coding RNAs. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have emerged as dominant molecular regulators. It would be significant to understand the potential cross-talk between RBPs and TRs, which could influence AHN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study employed computational analyses to identify RBPs and TRs regulating AHN, followed by the analysis of their interaction networks and detection of hub proteins. Next, the potential mutual regulation of hub TRs and RBPs was analyzed. Additionally, hippocampal genes differentially expressed upon exercise were analyzed for potential regulation by the identified TRs and RBPs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 TRs and 26 RBPs were found to influence AHN, which could also form interactive networks. Polycomb complex proteins were among the TR network hubs, while HNRNP and SRSF family members were among the hub RBPs. Further, the polycomb complex proteins and SRSF1 could have a mutual regulatory relationship, suggesting a cross-talk between epigenetic/transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory pathways. A number of exercise-induced hippocampal genes were also found to be potential targets of the identified TRs and RBPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SRSF1 may influence post-transcriptional stability, localization, and alternative splicing patterns of polycomb complex transcripts, and the polycomb proteins may in turn epigenetically influence the SRSF1. Further experimental validation of these regulatory loops/networks could provide novel insights into the molecular regulation of AHN, and unravel new targets for disease-treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":" ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-023-00034-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) is a clinically significant neural phenomenon. Understanding its molecular regulation would be important. In this regard, most studies have focused on transcriptional regulators (TRs), epigenetic modifiers, or non-coding RNAs. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) have emerged as dominant molecular regulators. It would be significant to understand the potential cross-talk between RBPs and TRs, which could influence AHN.

Methods: The present study employed computational analyses to identify RBPs and TRs regulating AHN, followed by the analysis of their interaction networks and detection of hub proteins. Next, the potential mutual regulation of hub TRs and RBPs was analyzed. Additionally, hippocampal genes differentially expressed upon exercise were analyzed for potential regulation by the identified TRs and RBPs.

Results: 105 TRs and 26 RBPs were found to influence AHN, which could also form interactive networks. Polycomb complex proteins were among the TR network hubs, while HNRNP and SRSF family members were among the hub RBPs. Further, the polycomb complex proteins and SRSF1 could have a mutual regulatory relationship, suggesting a cross-talk between epigenetic/transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory pathways. A number of exercise-induced hippocampal genes were also found to be potential targets of the identified TRs and RBPs.

Conclusion: SRSF1 may influence post-transcriptional stability, localization, and alternative splicing patterns of polycomb complex transcripts, and the polycomb proteins may in turn epigenetically influence the SRSF1. Further experimental validation of these regulatory loops/networks could provide novel insights into the molecular regulation of AHN, and unravel new targets for disease-treatment.

转录调控因子与rna结合蛋白之间的串扰计算分析表明,多梳蛋白和SRSF1相互调控影响成年海马神经发生
背景:成人海马神经发生(AHN)是一种具有临床意义的神经现象。了解其分子调控非常重要。在这方面,大多数研究都集中在转录调节因子(TR)、表观遗传学修饰物或非编码RNA上。RNA结合蛋白(RBPs)已成为主要的分子调节因子。了解RBPs和TRs之间可能影响AHN的潜在串扰将具有重要意义。方法:本研究采用计算分析来确定调节AHN的RBPs和TR,然后分析它们的相互作用网络和检测中枢蛋白。接下来,分析了中枢TRs和RBP的潜在相互调节。此外,还分析了运动时差异表达的海马基因通过识别的TRs和RBPs的潜在调节。结果:发现105个TRs和26个RBPs影响AHN,它们也可以形成相互作用的网络。多梳复合体蛋白属于TR网络中枢,而HNRNP和SRSF家族成员属于中枢RBP。此外,多梳复合体蛋白和SRSF1可能具有相互调节关系,表明表观遗传/转录和转录后调节途径之间存在串扰。许多运动诱导的海马基因也被发现是已鉴定的TRs和RBPs的潜在靶点。结论:SRSF1可能影响polycomb复合物转录物的转录后稳定性、定位和选择性剪接模式,polycomb蛋白可能反过来从表观遗传学上影响SRSF1。对这些调控环/网络的进一步实验验证可以为AHN的分子调控提供新的见解,并揭示疾病治疗的新靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信