MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN PRESPEKTIF GENDER TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA

Q3 Mathematics
Bedilius Gunur, A. Ramda
{"title":"MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN PRESPEKTIF GENDER TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA","authors":"Bedilius Gunur, A. Ramda","doi":"10.46244/numeracy.v7i1.1000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to; 1) comparing the Problem Based Learning model with the direct learning model from the perspective of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. 2). Look at the interaction of effects between learning models and gender on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The design of this study used a 2 x 2 factorial design. Sampling was carried out using a simple random sampling technique by first conducting a class equality test. Data was collected using a test technique in the form of a question matter. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. The analysis shows that; 1). The problem-based learning model of learning is better than the direct learning model in terms of students 'mathematical punishment abilities, 2. There was no interaction between the learning models used with the gender on the students' mathematical punishment abilities of students. Both male and female students requested compilation to be taught by applying the problem-based learning model to the direct learning model. \nAbstrak \nPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk; 1) membandingkan model Problem Based Learning dengan model pembelajaran langsung dalam perspektif kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. 2). Melihat interaksi efek antara model pembelajaran dan gender terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Rancangan penelitian ini menggunakan desain factorial 2 x 2. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik simpel random sampling dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan uji kesetaraan kelas. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik tes dengan bentuk soal uraian. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa; 1). Model pembelajaran problem based learning lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran lansung dalam hal kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa, 2. Tidak terdapat efek interaksi antara model pembelajaran yang digunakan dengan gender terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Baik siswa laki-laki maupun siswa perempuan sama baiknya ketika dibelajarkan dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran problem based learning dari pada model pembelajaran lansung. \nKata Kunci:  Problem Based Learning; Gender; Penalaran Matematis","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":"7 1","pages":"65-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Numeracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v7i1.1000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research aims to; 1) comparing the Problem Based Learning model with the direct learning model from the perspective of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. 2). Look at the interaction of effects between learning models and gender on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The design of this study used a 2 x 2 factorial design. Sampling was carried out using a simple random sampling technique by first conducting a class equality test. Data was collected using a test technique in the form of a question matter. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. The analysis shows that; 1). The problem-based learning model of learning is better than the direct learning model in terms of students 'mathematical punishment abilities, 2. There was no interaction between the learning models used with the gender on the students' mathematical punishment abilities of students. Both male and female students requested compilation to be taught by applying the problem-based learning model to the direct learning model. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk; 1) membandingkan model Problem Based Learning dengan model pembelajaran langsung dalam perspektif kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. 2). Melihat interaksi efek antara model pembelajaran dan gender terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Rancangan penelitian ini menggunakan desain factorial 2 x 2. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik simpel random sampling dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan uji kesetaraan kelas. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik tes dengan bentuk soal uraian. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa; 1). Model pembelajaran problem based learning lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran lansung dalam hal kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa, 2. Tidak terdapat efek interaksi antara model pembelajaran yang digunakan dengan gender terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Baik siswa laki-laki maupun siswa perempuan sama baiknya ketika dibelajarkan dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran problem based learning dari pada model pembelajaran lansung. Kata Kunci:  Problem Based Learning; Gender; Penalaran Matematis
基于模型问题的学习与实施swamatematic融资的前瞻性问题
本研究旨在:;1) 从学生数学推理能力的角度比较了基于问题的学习模式和直接学习模式。2) 。研究学习模式和性别对学生数学推理能力的影响。本研究的设计采用了2x2析因设计。通过首先进行类别平等测试,使用简单的随机抽样技术进行抽样。数据是使用测试技术以问题的形式收集的。使用双向方差分析对数据进行分析。分析表明:;1) 。在学生的数学惩罚能力方面,基于问题的学习模式优于直接学习模式。性别对学生数学惩罚能力的影响不存在交互作用。男女学生都要求通过将基于问题的学习模式应用于直接学习模式来教授汇编。本研究摘要旨在:;1) 就学生的数学偿付能力而言,将基于问题的学习模式与直接学习模式进行比较。2) 。看到学习模式与性别对学生解决数学问题能力的互动。本研究项目采用因子设计2x2。抽样采用简单的随机抽样技术,首先进行类平等测试。数据是使用一种铀形式的测试技术收集的。使用双线ANAVA分析数据。分析表明:;1) 。在学生的数学偿付能力方面,基于问题的学习模式优于直接学习模式。与性别一起使用的学习模式对学生解决数学问题的能力没有交互作用。男学生和女学生通过应用正在进行的学习模式中的基于问题的学习模式来学习时都一样好。关键字:性别数学配置
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Numeracy
Numeracy Mathematics-Mathematics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信