Paul Ciobanu, Manuela-Maria Manziuc, Smaranda Dana Buduru, Diana Dudea
{"title":"Endocrowns - a literature review.","authors":"Paul Ciobanu, Manuela-Maria Manziuc, Smaranda Dana Buduru, Diana Dudea","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The opportunity of using Endocrown-type restorations in the current prosthetic dentistry practice as an alternative to other, well-established methods of corono-radicular restorations and the evolving palette of adhesive materials has made these restorations more popular in the last few years.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose is to review the available literature about Endocrown restorations regarding mechanical properties - fracture strength and resistance, survival rate, the preparation design - marginal and internal adaptation, and esthetics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The search was carried out on four databases: PubMed, Scopus (ScienceDirect), Web of Science, and Scielo using the following terms: \"endocrowns\", \"endodontic crown\", and\" no buildup crown\". Initially, a total of 163 articles published between 2015 and May 2021 were selected. After the duplicates, papers presented only as abstracts, articles in any other languages except English, and review articles were eliminated; a total of 72 articles remained to be considered for this review.After assessing the 72 considered articles, 37 were chosen as fit for this review. The reasons for the elimination of the other 35 articles were: their main focus was other than endocrowns, e.g., direct restorations, indirect restorations of vital teeth; case reports; study protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 37 articles selected, 34 were focused on mechanical properties, including the influence of the preparation design, and three on survival rate, of which one also had a point of view regarding esthetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The literature included in this review shows that endocrowns perform similarly or even better in some cases than other coronal restorations. However, this statement must be interpreted cautiously, given that most articles were <i>in vitro</i> or finite element analysis studies. Given the high degree of conflicting results found in the articles included in this review, the authors consider as reasonable to conclude that further studies are needed to confirm the feasibility of endocrowns and the best choice of material.</p>","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":" ","pages":"358-367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The opportunity of using Endocrown-type restorations in the current prosthetic dentistry practice as an alternative to other, well-established methods of corono-radicular restorations and the evolving palette of adhesive materials has made these restorations more popular in the last few years.
Objective: The purpose is to review the available literature about Endocrown restorations regarding mechanical properties - fracture strength and resistance, survival rate, the preparation design - marginal and internal adaptation, and esthetics.
Method: The search was carried out on four databases: PubMed, Scopus (ScienceDirect), Web of Science, and Scielo using the following terms: "endocrowns", "endodontic crown", and" no buildup crown". Initially, a total of 163 articles published between 2015 and May 2021 were selected. After the duplicates, papers presented only as abstracts, articles in any other languages except English, and review articles were eliminated; a total of 72 articles remained to be considered for this review.After assessing the 72 considered articles, 37 were chosen as fit for this review. The reasons for the elimination of the other 35 articles were: their main focus was other than endocrowns, e.g., direct restorations, indirect restorations of vital teeth; case reports; study protocols.
Results: From the 37 articles selected, 34 were focused on mechanical properties, including the influence of the preparation design, and three on survival rate, of which one also had a point of view regarding esthetics.
Conclusions: The literature included in this review shows that endocrowns perform similarly or even better in some cases than other coronal restorations. However, this statement must be interpreted cautiously, given that most articles were in vitro or finite element analysis studies. Given the high degree of conflicting results found in the articles included in this review, the authors consider as reasonable to conclude that further studies are needed to confirm the feasibility of endocrowns and the best choice of material.
介绍。在目前的牙科义齿实践中,使用牙冠型修复体作为替代其他完善的冠根修复方法的机会,以及粘合剂材料的不断发展,使得这些修复体在过去几年中更受欢迎。目标。目的是回顾现有文献关于内冠修复体的力学性能-断裂强度和耐受性,存活率,制备设计-边缘和内部适应,以及美学。方法。在PubMed、Scopus (ScienceDirect)、Web of Science和Scielo四个数据库中进行检索,使用以下术语:“endocrowns”、“endodontic crown”和“no积累冠”。最初,在2015年至2021年5月期间发表的163篇文章被选中。重复后,仅以摘要形式出现的论文、除英语以外的任何其他语言的文章和评论文章被剔除;本次综述共有72篇文章有待考虑。在对72篇考虑的文章进行评估后,选择了37篇适合本综述。其余35篇文章被淘汰的原因是:主要关注的不是牙内冠,如直接修复、间接修复;病例报告;研究协议。结果。在入选的37篇文章中,34篇是关于机械性能的,包括制备设计的影响,3篇是关于存活率的,其中1篇也有关于美学的观点。结论。本综述中包含的文献表明,在某些情况下,内冠的表现与其他冠状体修复相似甚至更好。然而,考虑到大多数文章是体外或有限元分析研究,必须谨慎解释这一说法。鉴于本综述中纳入的文章中发现的高度矛盾的结果,作者认为有理由得出结论,需要进一步的研究来确认内冠的可行性和材料的最佳选择。