Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block in children undergoing elective open pyeloplasty - A randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Isaac Lalfakzuala Ralte, Debesh Bhoi, Praveen Talawar, Ganga Prasad, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Prabudh Goel
{"title":"Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block in children undergoing elective open pyeloplasty - A randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.","authors":"Isaac Lalfakzuala Ralte, Debesh Bhoi, Praveen Talawar, Ganga Prasad, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Prabudh Goel","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_173_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QL-3) and erector spinae block (ESP) in children undergoing open pyeloplasty was done in this study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study conducted in a tertiary care center, operating rooms, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and paediatric surgical ward. Sixty children of age 1-6 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II, undergoing elective open pyeloplasty were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups: group I (QL block-3) and group II (ESP). Both blocks were performed under USG guidance using 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine after induction of general anesthesia. Postoperative Modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS), perioperative hemodynamic parameters, perioperative time for first rescue analgesia, total rescue analgesia, and incidence of complications were recorded. Statistical tests were applied as follows: (i) quantitative variables were compared using independent <i>t</i>-test/Mann-Whitney test (when the data sets were not normally distributed) between the two groups, and repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Friedman test was used for comparison between different time intervals within the same group and (ii) qualitative variables were correlated using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. A <i>P</i> value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain was assessed using MOPS in the postoperative period at 0, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h. Overall, the pain scores were low and showed a decreasing trend toward baseline as time progressed. Group I showed lower score, but was statistically significant only at the sixth hour. Highest mean score was 2.4 ± 2.01 in group I and 2.67 ± 2.32 in group II. Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable. Total rescue analgesia during the perioperative period was not statistically significant (intraoperative <i>P</i> = 0.075 and postoperative <i>P</i> = 0.928). Also, 63.33% patients in group I and 63% patients in group II required rescue analgesia in the postoperative period and were comparable. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) for first rescue analgesia time was 6.32 ± 12.57 in group I and 16.67 ± 31.25 in group II, but not significant. The distribution in group II was skewed, hence the larger value for group II, but when compared to group I, this was statistically not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both ultrasound-guided ESP block and QL block using 0.25% ropivacaine 0.5 ml/kg provided adequate analgesia during the first 24 h post-surgery in children undergoing open pyeloplasty. The fentanyl requirement during the first 24-h postoperative period was also decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_173_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QL-3) and erector spinae block (ESP) in children undergoing open pyeloplasty was done in this study.

Material and methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study conducted in a tertiary care center, operating rooms, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and paediatric surgical ward. Sixty children of age 1-6 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II, undergoing elective open pyeloplasty were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two groups: group I (QL block-3) and group II (ESP). Both blocks were performed under USG guidance using 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine after induction of general anesthesia. Postoperative Modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS), perioperative hemodynamic parameters, perioperative time for first rescue analgesia, total rescue analgesia, and incidence of complications were recorded. Statistical tests were applied as follows: (i) quantitative variables were compared using independent t-test/Mann-Whitney test (when the data sets were not normally distributed) between the two groups, and repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Friedman test was used for comparison between different time intervals within the same group and (ii) qualitative variables were correlated using the Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Pain was assessed using MOPS in the postoperative period at 0, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h. Overall, the pain scores were low and showed a decreasing trend toward baseline as time progressed. Group I showed lower score, but was statistically significant only at the sixth hour. Highest mean score was 2.4 ± 2.01 in group I and 2.67 ± 2.32 in group II. Perioperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable. Total rescue analgesia during the perioperative period was not statistically significant (intraoperative P = 0.075 and postoperative P = 0.928). Also, 63.33% patients in group I and 63% patients in group II required rescue analgesia in the postoperative period and were comparable. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) for first rescue analgesia time was 6.32 ± 12.57 in group I and 16.67 ± 31.25 in group II, but not significant. The distribution in group II was skewed, hence the larger value for group II, but when compared to group I, this was statistically not significant.

Conclusion: Both ultrasound-guided ESP block and QL block using 0.25% ropivacaine 0.5 ml/kg provided adequate analgesia during the first 24 h post-surgery in children undergoing open pyeloplasty. The fentanyl requirement during the first 24-h postoperative period was also decreased.

超声引导下腰方肌阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞在儿童择期开窗肾盂成形术中的镇痛效果比较——一项随机、双盲、对照研究
比较超声引导下经腰方肌阻滞(QL-3)与竖脊肌阻滞(ESP)在儿童开腹肾盂成形术中的镇痛效果。这是一项随机、双盲、对照研究,在三级护理中心、手术室、麻醉后护理单位(PACU)和儿科外科病房进行。60名年龄1-6岁的儿童,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)等级为I或II,接受选择性开放式肾盂成形术。患者随机分为两组:I组(QL block-3)和II组(ESP)。两组阻滞均在USG指导下进行,全麻诱导后使用0.5 ml/kg 0.25%罗哌卡因。记录术后修正客观疼痛评分(Modified Objective Pain Score, MOPS)、围手术期血流动力学参数、围手术期首次抢救镇痛时间、总抢救镇痛时间、并发症发生率。采用统计学检验:(i)两组间定量变量比较采用独立t检验/ Mann-Whitney检验(当数据集非正态分布时),同一组内不同时间间隔间比较采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)/Friedman检验;(ii)定性变量相关性分析采用卡方检验/Fisher精确检验。P值<0.05认为有统计学意义。术后0、30分钟、1、2、4、6、12和24小时采用MOPS评估疼痛。总体而言,疼痛评分较低,并随着时间的推移呈下降趋势。第一组得分较低,但仅在第6小时有统计学意义。第一组平均评分最高,为2.4±2.01,第二组平均评分最高,为2.67±2.32。围手术期血流动力学参数比较。围手术期全抢救镇痛差异无统计学意义(术中P = 0.075,术后P = 0.928)。I组63.33%的患者和II组63%的患者在术后需要抢救性镇痛,具有可比性。第一组首次抢救镇痛时间的均值±标准差(SD)为6.32±12.57,第二组为16.67±31.25,差异无统计学意义。II组的分布偏倚,因此II组的值较大,但与I组相比,这在统计学上不显著。超声引导下使用0.25%罗哌卡因0.5 ml/kg的ESP阻滞和QL阻滞均可在开腹肾盂成形术患儿术后24小时内提供足够的镇痛。术后前24小时芬太尼需用量也有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信