Evaluation of FLANG versus mitoxantrone and etoposide for the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia

IF 1.1 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
V. Mehrzad, M. Mirpourian, P. Farrokhi
{"title":"Evaluation of FLANG versus mitoxantrone and etoposide for the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia","authors":"V. Mehrzad, M. Mirpourian, P. Farrokhi","doi":"10.34172/ipp.2022.27272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Failure to respond to the chemotherapy and relapse occurrence is considerably high in acute leukemia as one of the most common hematologic malignancies requiring emergent efficacious well-tolerated salvage therapy. However, varieties of regimens have been investigated, since the best approach with an optimal response is a question. Objectives: In our study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of FLANG (fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone and G-CSF) versus mitoxantrone and etoposide for the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 45 patients with acute leukemia were randomly divided into two groups of salvage therapy with FLANG (n=23) and mitoxantrone and etoposide (n=22). The patients were followed for five years. Progression-free survival, response to the treatment, chemotherapy-induced toxicity based on Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4 (CTCAE-4), and mortality were compared between the groups. Besides, to estimate the survival Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression were used. Results: Comparison of the two regimens revealed insignificant differences in terms of response rate (P=0.87), chemotherapy-induced toxicity (P=0.22) and mortality rate (P=0.26) and etiology of mortality (P=0.98). The median progression-free survival following FALNG and the latter regimen was four months (95% CI: 3.183, 4.862) versus three months (95% CI: 1.777, 4.223; P=0.38 ), respectively. Conclusion: Based on this study, the two salvage regimens of mitoxantrone plus etoposide and FLANG were similar in terms of complete remission, progression-free survival, and toxicity for the cases with refractory/ relapsed acute leukemia. Trial Registration: This study has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials and obtained code IRCT20190618043939N1 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/40272, Ethical code# IR.MUI.MED.REC.1398.586).","PeriodicalId":13454,"journal":{"name":"Immunopathologia Persa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunopathologia Persa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2022.27272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Failure to respond to the chemotherapy and relapse occurrence is considerably high in acute leukemia as one of the most common hematologic malignancies requiring emergent efficacious well-tolerated salvage therapy. However, varieties of regimens have been investigated, since the best approach with an optimal response is a question. Objectives: In our study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of FLANG (fludarabine, cytosine arabinoside, mitoxantrone and G-CSF) versus mitoxantrone and etoposide for the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 45 patients with acute leukemia were randomly divided into two groups of salvage therapy with FLANG (n=23) and mitoxantrone and etoposide (n=22). The patients were followed for five years. Progression-free survival, response to the treatment, chemotherapy-induced toxicity based on Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4 (CTCAE-4), and mortality were compared between the groups. Besides, to estimate the survival Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression were used. Results: Comparison of the two regimens revealed insignificant differences in terms of response rate (P=0.87), chemotherapy-induced toxicity (P=0.22) and mortality rate (P=0.26) and etiology of mortality (P=0.98). The median progression-free survival following FALNG and the latter regimen was four months (95% CI: 3.183, 4.862) versus three months (95% CI: 1.777, 4.223; P=0.38 ), respectively. Conclusion: Based on this study, the two salvage regimens of mitoxantrone plus etoposide and FLANG were similar in terms of complete remission, progression-free survival, and toxicity for the cases with refractory/ relapsed acute leukemia. Trial Registration: This study has been registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials and obtained code IRCT20190618043939N1 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/40272, Ethical code# IR.MUI.MED.REC.1398.586).
FLANG与米托蒽醌和依托泊苷治疗难治性/复发性急性白血病的疗效评价
引言:急性白血病是最常见的血液系统恶性肿瘤之一,需要紧急有效的耐受性良好的挽救治疗,化疗无效和复发的发生率相当高。然而,已经对各种方案进行了研究,因为具有最佳反应的最佳方法是一个问题。目的:在我们的研究中,我们旨在比较FLANG(氟达拉滨、阿糖胞苷、米托蒽醌和G-CSF)与米托蒽醌、依托泊苷治疗难治性/复发性急性白血病的疗效。患者和方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,45例急性白血病患者被随机分为两组,分别用FLANG(n=23)和米托蒽醌和依托泊苷(n=22)进行挽救治疗。这些病人被随访了五年。比较两组之间的无进展生存率、对治疗的反应、基于不良反应标准第4版(CTCAE-4)的化疗诱导毒性和死亡率。此外,使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归来估计生存率。结果:两种方案的比较显示,在有效率(P=0.87)、化疗诱导的毒性(P=0.22)、死亡率(P=0.26)和死亡率病因(P=0.98)方面差异不显著。FANG和后一种方案的中位无进展生存期分别为4个月(95%CI:3.183,4.862)和3个月(95%CI:1.77,4.223;P=0.38)。结论:基于本研究,米托蒽醌联合依托泊苷和FLANG两种挽救方案在难治性/复发性急性白血病患者的完全缓解、无进展生存率和毒性方面是相似的。试验注册:本研究已在伊朗临床试验注册中心注册,代码为IRCT201990618043939N1(https://en.irct.ir/trial/40272,道德规范#IR.MUI.MED.REC.1398.586)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信