Student perceptions of remote learning transitions in engineering disciplines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-national study

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
A. Behera, Ricardo Alves de Sousa, V. Oleksik, Jingyan Dong, D. Fritzen
{"title":"Student perceptions of remote learning transitions in engineering disciplines during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-national study","authors":"A. Behera, Ricardo Alves de Sousa, V. Oleksik, Jingyan Dong, D. Fritzen","doi":"10.1080/03043797.2022.2080529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study captures student perceptions of the effectiveness of remote learning and assessment in two associated engineering disciplines, mechanical and industrial, during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-national study. A structured questionnaire with 24 items on a 5-point Likert scale was used. Parallel and exploratory factor analyses identified three primary subscales. The links between student perceptions and assessment outcomes were also studied. There was a clear preference for face-to-face teaching, with the highest for laboratories. Remote live lectures were preferred over recorded. Although students found the switch to remote learning helpful, group work and communication were highlighted as concern areas. Mean scores on subscales indicate a low preference for remote learning (2.23), modest delivery effectiveness (3.05) and effective digital delivery tools (3.61). Gender effects were found significant on all subscales, along with significant interactions with university and year-group. Preference for remote delivery of design-based modules was significantly higher than others.","PeriodicalId":47348,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"110 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2080529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study captures student perceptions of the effectiveness of remote learning and assessment in two associated engineering disciplines, mechanical and industrial, during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cross-national study. A structured questionnaire with 24 items on a 5-point Likert scale was used. Parallel and exploratory factor analyses identified three primary subscales. The links between student perceptions and assessment outcomes were also studied. There was a clear preference for face-to-face teaching, with the highest for laboratories. Remote live lectures were preferred over recorded. Although students found the switch to remote learning helpful, group work and communication were highlighted as concern areas. Mean scores on subscales indicate a low preference for remote learning (2.23), modest delivery effectiveness (3.05) and effective digital delivery tools (3.61). Gender effects were found significant on all subscales, along with significant interactions with university and year-group. Preference for remote delivery of design-based modules was significantly higher than others.
在COVID-19大流行期间,学生对工程学科远程学习转变的看法:一项跨国研究
本研究在一项跨国研究中捕捉了学生对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间机械和工业两个相关工程学科远程学习和评估有效性的看法。采用5点李克特量表,共24个项目的结构化问卷。平行和探索性因素分析确定了三个主要子量表。学生的看法和评估结果之间的联系也进行了研究。学生们明显倾向于面对面教学,其中实验室教学的比例最高。远程直播讲座比录制讲座更受欢迎。虽然学生们发现远程学习很有帮助,但小组工作和交流是重点关注的领域。子量表的平均得分表明,学生对远程学习的偏好较低(2.23),教学效果适中(3.05),有效的数字教学工具(3.61)。性别影响在所有子量表上都很显著,在大学和年级组之间也有显著的相互作用。对远程交付基于设计的模块的偏好明显高于其他。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Engineering Education
European Journal of Engineering Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: European Journal of Engineering Education is published six times a year in print and electronic editions and provides an essential forum for dialogue between researchers and specialists in the field of engineering education, at European and worldwide levels. European Journal of Engineering Education is the Official Journal of SEFI, the Socièté Européenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs (the European Society for Engineering Education). SEFI is a non-governmental organization whose aims are to develop information about engineering education, to improve communication and exchange between professors, researchers and students and to promote cooperation between the various institutions concerned with engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信