Rebalancing Distorted Science Policy

Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1353/stu.2023.a901527
W. Kingston
{"title":"Rebalancing Distorted Science Policy","authors":"W. Kingston","doi":"10.1353/stu.2023.a901527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an earlier article in Studies I discussed Ireland’s need for indigenous economic innovation, and what might be done about it.1 What follows focusses on related issues of excessive and wrongly directed expenditure on scientific research as a barrier to the achievement of this. After it became accepted in the 1950s that the policy of protecting infant industries had failed, there were several decades of debate about ways of replacing it. Amongst these was a linear theory of economic innovation. This is that money invested in basic research will lead to opportunities for applied research, from which new businesses, products and jobs will result. This theory suits academic scientists, who can never have enough money for research. Also, all bureaucracies are under internal pressure to grow. Their combination has saddled the country with a disproportionate and misdirected level of subsidy for science.","PeriodicalId":82834,"journal":{"name":"Studies","volume":"112 1","pages":"212 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/stu.2023.a901527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an earlier article in Studies I discussed Ireland’s need for indigenous economic innovation, and what might be done about it.1 What follows focusses on related issues of excessive and wrongly directed expenditure on scientific research as a barrier to the achievement of this. After it became accepted in the 1950s that the policy of protecting infant industries had failed, there were several decades of debate about ways of replacing it. Amongst these was a linear theory of economic innovation. This is that money invested in basic research will lead to opportunities for applied research, from which new businesses, products and jobs will result. This theory suits academic scientists, who can never have enough money for research. Also, all bureaucracies are under internal pressure to grow. Their combination has saddled the country with a disproportionate and misdirected level of subsidy for science.
重新平衡扭曲的科学政策
在《研究》杂志早些时候的一篇文章中,我讨论了爱尔兰对本土经济创新的需求,以及可能采取的措施。在20世纪50年代,保护新兴产业的政策失败后,人们对如何取代它进行了几十年的争论。其中包括经济创新的线性理论。这就是投资于基础研究的资金将带来应用研究的机会,从而产生新的业务、产品和工作。这一理论适合学术科学家,因为他们永远不会有足够的资金进行研究。此外,所有官僚机构都面临着发展的内部压力。它们的结合给这个国家带来了不成比例和误导性的科学补贴水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书