An Empirical Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Village Exploitation on the Local Economy: Evidence from a National Cultural Policy

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Zhimin Li, Youze Lang, Guoqiang Lou, Jizhou Zheng
{"title":"An Empirical Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Village Exploitation on the Local Economy: Evidence from a National Cultural Policy","authors":"Zhimin Li, Youze Lang, Guoqiang Lou, Jizhou Zheng","doi":"10.1177/00219096231192313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To overcome the difficulty of assessing cultural effects, we designed a quasi-natural experiment using a traditional Chinese village selection as cultural policy. Using county panel data from 2009 to 2017, we estimated the impact of traditional village exploitation on county economies using a staggered difference in differences (DID) model. The results showed that counties with national traditional villages have a significantly higher gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP per capita than the control group, with a yearly increasing trend. The heterogeneity analysis revealed that the effect of this cultural policy in the eastern, central, and western regions was very different. The impact was most significant in the less-developed regions of western China. This result indicates that cultural policies are advantageous for reducing regional developmental imbalances. The mechanism test also showed that the greater the distinctiveness and agglomeration of cultural resources, the greater the impact of traditional village exploitation on the county economy. In addition, we found that national 5A Scenery Sites do not have a driving effect, but rather a polarizing effect, on counties where traditional villages are located. Through a series of robustness tests, our conclusions hold true.","PeriodicalId":46881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian and African Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian and African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231192313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To overcome the difficulty of assessing cultural effects, we designed a quasi-natural experiment using a traditional Chinese village selection as cultural policy. Using county panel data from 2009 to 2017, we estimated the impact of traditional village exploitation on county economies using a staggered difference in differences (DID) model. The results showed that counties with national traditional villages have a significantly higher gross domestic product (GDP) and GDP per capita than the control group, with a yearly increasing trend. The heterogeneity analysis revealed that the effect of this cultural policy in the eastern, central, and western regions was very different. The impact was most significant in the less-developed regions of western China. This result indicates that cultural policies are advantageous for reducing regional developmental imbalances. The mechanism test also showed that the greater the distinctiveness and agglomeration of cultural resources, the greater the impact of traditional village exploitation on the county economy. In addition, we found that national 5A Scenery Sites do not have a driving effect, but rather a polarizing effect, on counties where traditional villages are located. Through a series of robustness tests, our conclusions hold true.
中国传统村落开发对地方经济的实证评价——来自国家文化政策的证据
为了克服评估文化效果的困难,我们设计了一个以中国传统村落选择为文化政策的准自然实验。利用2009年至2017年的县面板数据,我们使用交错差异模型(DID)估计了传统村庄开发对县经济的影响。结果表明,具有民族传统村落的县的国内生产总值和人均国内生产总值显著高于对照组,并呈逐年增长趋势。异质性分析表明,这种文化政策在东部、中部和西部地区的效果有很大差异。这种影响在中国西部欠发达地区最为显著。这一结果表明,文化政策有利于减少区域发展失衡。机制检验还表明,文化资源的独特性和集聚性越大,传统村落开发对县域经济的影响就越大。此外,我们发现,国家5A级风景名胜区对传统村落所在的县并没有驱动作用,而是两极分化。通过一系列稳健性测试,我们的结论是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Asian and African Studies (JAAS) was founded in 1965 to further research and study on Asia and Africa. JAAS is a peer reviewed journal of area studies recognised for consistent scholarly contributions to cutting-edge issues and debates. The journal welcomes articles, research notes, and book reviews that focus on the dynamics of global change and development of Asian and African nations, societies, cultures, and the global community. Published articles cover: -development and change -technology and communication -globalization -public administration -politics -economy -education -health, wealth, and welfare -poverty and growth -humanities -sociology -political science -linguistics -economics JAAS adheres to a double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Decisions on manuscripts will be taken as rapidly as possible. However, while it is hoped that a decision can be made in 6-8 weeks, the refereeing process makes it impossible to predict the length of time that will be required to process any given manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信