Boredom in Educational contexts: a critical review

Q4 Social Sciences
Tom Feldges, Sonia Pieczenko
{"title":"Boredom in Educational contexts: a critical review","authors":"Tom Feldges, Sonia Pieczenko","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/11035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While developing the ambiguity of the concept of boredom, we discuss a psychological, neuroscientific and an educational-phenomenological approach to boredom in educational settings. Analysing these various perspectives with the help of a recently developed taxonomy of four different boredom types, we argue that the classification conflates antecedent and resultant states with actual boredom. Although such classifications may still be helpful for practical purposes, we argue that approaches that are mostly driven by an aim to control and avoid boredom do not allow for a critical questioning of the potential role that boredom plays in education, and that it does not cater for a critical self-reflection on traditional aspects of the educational provision.","PeriodicalId":38147,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopaideia","volume":"24 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopaideia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/11035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While developing the ambiguity of the concept of boredom, we discuss a psychological, neuroscientific and an educational-phenomenological approach to boredom in educational settings. Analysing these various perspectives with the help of a recently developed taxonomy of four different boredom types, we argue that the classification conflates antecedent and resultant states with actual boredom. Although such classifications may still be helpful for practical purposes, we argue that approaches that are mostly driven by an aim to control and avoid boredom do not allow for a critical questioning of the potential role that boredom plays in education, and that it does not cater for a critical self-reflection on traditional aspects of the educational provision.
教育背景下的无聊:一篇批判性评论
在发展无聊概念的模糊性的同时,我们讨论了心理学、神经科学和教育现象学的方法来研究教育环境中的无聊。在最近发展的四种不同无聊类型的分类法的帮助下,我们分析了这些不同的观点,我们认为这种分类将先行状态和结果状态与实际无聊混为一谈。虽然这样的分类可能仍然有助于实际目的,但我们认为,主要由控制和避免无聊的目的驱动的方法不允许对无聊在教育中扮演的潜在角色进行批判性质疑,并且它不满足对教育提供的传统方面的批判性自我反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Encyclopaideia
Encyclopaideia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信