Risk Factors for Rebleeding After Successful Rapid Rhino Packing in Epistaxis Patients.

Journal of Rhinology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-30 DOI:10.18787/jr.2023.00001
Joon Taek Oh, Mi Rye Bae
{"title":"Risk Factors for Rebleeding After Successful Rapid Rhino Packing in Epistaxis Patients.","authors":"Joon Taek Oh, Mi Rye Bae","doi":"10.18787/jr.2023.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Epistaxis is one of the most common emergencies in otolaryngology, and the recently developed Rapid Rhino nasal pack, a balloon-type nasal packing device, is widely used in emergency departments. Rebleeding after initial treatment increases patients' discomfort and medical costs. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for rebleeding in patients treated with Rapid Rhino packing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 93 patients with epistaxis treated with Rapid Rhino from January 2020 to November 2022 were divided into the well-controlled group (39 patients) and the rebleeding group (54 patients), and the baseline characteristics, management methods, and complications were compared between these groups. The rebleeding group was divided according to whether patients experienced a single episode of rebleeding (38 patients) or multiple rebleeding episodes (16 patients), and the differences between these two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Oral anticoagulation therapy was associated with a higher risk of rebleeding after Rapid Rhino packing (odds ratio [OR]=8.41, p=0.047). A history of nasal surgery was associated with multiple rebleeding (OR=22.55, p=0.009). Age, sex, the management method, complications, and the site of bleeding were not found to be related to rebleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with rebleeding after Rapid Rhino nasal packing had a higher rate of concurrent oral anticoagulation therapy. A history of nasal surgery was strongly associated with multiple episodes of rebleeding. A detailed medical history can be important for assessing the risk of rebleeding in epistaxis patients treated with Rapid Rhino packing.</p>","PeriodicalId":33935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2023.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Epistaxis is one of the most common emergencies in otolaryngology, and the recently developed Rapid Rhino nasal pack, a balloon-type nasal packing device, is widely used in emergency departments. Rebleeding after initial treatment increases patients' discomfort and medical costs. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for rebleeding in patients treated with Rapid Rhino packing.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 93 patients with epistaxis treated with Rapid Rhino from January 2020 to November 2022 were divided into the well-controlled group (39 patients) and the rebleeding group (54 patients), and the baseline characteristics, management methods, and complications were compared between these groups. The rebleeding group was divided according to whether patients experienced a single episode of rebleeding (38 patients) or multiple rebleeding episodes (16 patients), and the differences between these two groups were compared.

Results: Oral anticoagulation therapy was associated with a higher risk of rebleeding after Rapid Rhino packing (odds ratio [OR]=8.41, p=0.047). A history of nasal surgery was associated with multiple rebleeding (OR=22.55, p=0.009). Age, sex, the management method, complications, and the site of bleeding were not found to be related to rebleeding.

Conclusion: Patients with rebleeding after Rapid Rhino nasal packing had a higher rate of concurrent oral anticoagulation therapy. A history of nasal surgery was strongly associated with multiple episodes of rebleeding. A detailed medical history can be important for assessing the risk of rebleeding in epistaxis patients treated with Rapid Rhino packing.

鼻出血患者快速鼻填塞成功后再出血的危险因素
背景与目的:鼻出血是耳鼻喉科最常见的急症之一,近年来研制的快速犀牛鼻填充器(Rapid Rhino nasal pack)被广泛应用于急诊科。初次治疗后再出血会增加患者的不适和医疗费用。本研究的目的是调查快速犀牛填充物治疗患者再出血的危险因素。方法:回顾性研究将2020年1月至2022年11月接受Rapid Rhino治疗的93例鼻出血患者分为对照良好组(39例)和再出血组(54例),比较两组患者的基线特征、处理方法和并发症。再出血组根据患者是单次再出血(38例)还是多次再出血(16例)进行分组,比较两组间的差异。结果:口服抗凝治疗与快速犀牛填塞术后再出血风险增高相关(优势比[OR]=8.41, p=0.047)。鼻部手术史与多次再出血相关(OR=22.55, p=0.009)。年龄、性别、处理方法、并发症和出血部位与再出血无关。结论:快速犀牛鼻填塞术后再出血患者同时接受口服抗凝治疗的比例较高。鼻手术史与多次再出血密切相关。详细的病史对于评估鼻出血患者再出血的风险非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信