Book Review: Editing in the Modern Classroom by Suzan Flanagan, & Michael J. Albers (Eds.)

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q3 BUSINESS
Akshata J. Balghare
{"title":"Book Review: Editing in the Modern Classroom by Suzan Flanagan, & Michael J. Albers (Eds.)","authors":"Akshata J. Balghare","doi":"10.1177/10506519231179966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editing in the Modern Classroom is an edited collection written by some of the “leading researchers and scholars in the field” (p. ix) of technical and professional communication. Underscoring that there has been a dearth of empirical research on technical editing, the book promotes more experiential research in the practice and pedagogy of technical editing. The editors, Suzan Flanagan and Michael J. Albers, strive to show what programmatic changes need to be made to teach students more than just copyediting, which usually lands them in “clerical positions” (p. 5). Divided into nine chapters, the “collection is solidly based on research and a comprehensive knowledge of the literature in the field” (p. ix). Chapter 1 is an overview of the book written by the editors, and the other eight chapters start with takeaways and end with insights into pedagogical practices based on the chapters’ topics, thus giving the chapters a common framework that makes them easier to follow. In Chapter 2, “The Current State of Technical Editing Research and Open Questions,” Flanagan situates the book in the field by looking at the previous empirical research in technical editing. In doing so, she “pinpoints knowledge gaps” (p. 16) and raises open research questions about workplace editing, classroom editing tests, various types of audiences, and so on. This chapter leaves the reader with thoughtful questions, such as “How do classroom assessments align with workplace assessments?” or “What are the best practices for editing and responding to documents written by nonnative speakers?” (p. 37). Overall, the chapter serves instructors as a reflective guide for checking how their pedagogy needs to be adjusted for Book Review","PeriodicalId":46414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Technical Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519231179966","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Editing in the Modern Classroom is an edited collection written by some of the “leading researchers and scholars in the field” (p. ix) of technical and professional communication. Underscoring that there has been a dearth of empirical research on technical editing, the book promotes more experiential research in the practice and pedagogy of technical editing. The editors, Suzan Flanagan and Michael J. Albers, strive to show what programmatic changes need to be made to teach students more than just copyediting, which usually lands them in “clerical positions” (p. 5). Divided into nine chapters, the “collection is solidly based on research and a comprehensive knowledge of the literature in the field” (p. ix). Chapter 1 is an overview of the book written by the editors, and the other eight chapters start with takeaways and end with insights into pedagogical practices based on the chapters’ topics, thus giving the chapters a common framework that makes them easier to follow. In Chapter 2, “The Current State of Technical Editing Research and Open Questions,” Flanagan situates the book in the field by looking at the previous empirical research in technical editing. In doing so, she “pinpoints knowledge gaps” (p. 16) and raises open research questions about workplace editing, classroom editing tests, various types of audiences, and so on. This chapter leaves the reader with thoughtful questions, such as “How do classroom assessments align with workplace assessments?” or “What are the best practices for editing and responding to documents written by nonnative speakers?” (p. 37). Overall, the chapter serves instructors as a reflective guide for checking how their pedagogy needs to be adjusted for Book Review
Suzan Flanagan和Michael J.Albers(编辑)的书评:《现代课堂中的编辑》
《现代课堂编辑》是由一些“该领域的顶尖研究人员和学者”(第九页)撰写的技术和专业传播编辑集。这本书强调了技术编辑缺乏实证研究,提倡在技术编辑的实践和教育学中进行更多的实证研究。编辑苏赞·弗拉纳根(Suzan Flanagan)和迈克尔·J·阿尔伯斯(Michael J.Albers。该集分为九章,“扎实地建立在研究和对该领域文献的全面了解的基础上”(第九页)。第1章是编辑们对这本书的概述,其他八章从要点开始,以基于章节主题的教学实践见解结束,从而为章节提供了一个通用的框架,使其更易于遵循。在第二章“技术编辑研究的现状和悬而未决的问题”中,弗拉纳根通过回顾以往技术编辑的实证研究,将本书置于该领域。在这样做的过程中,她“指出了知识差距”(第16页),并提出了关于工作场所编辑、课堂编辑测试、各种类型的受众等的公开研究问题,例如“课堂评估如何与工作场所评估保持一致?”或“编辑和回复非母语人士撰写的文档的最佳实践是什么?”(第37页)。总的来说,本章作为教师的反思指南,检查他们的教学法需要如何根据书评进行调整
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: JBTC is a refereed journal that provides a forum for discussion of communication practices, problems, and trends in business, professional, scientific, and governmental fields. As such, JBTC offers opportunities for bridging dichotomies that have traditionally existed in professional communication journals between business and technical communication and between industrial and academic audiences. Because JBTC is designed to disseminate knowledge that can lead to improved communication practices in both academe and industry, the journal favors research that will inform professional communicators in both sectors. However, articles addressing one sector or the other will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信