Venus and Adonis The Rape of Lucrece, and the Shakespeare Canon

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
P. Cheney
{"title":"Venus and Adonis The Rape of Lucrece, and the Shakespeare Canon","authors":"P. Cheney","doi":"10.1353/sip.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay revisits one of the oldest topics of Shakespeare criticism: the relation between Venus and Adonis, The Rape of Lucrece, and the plays. From Charles Gildon forward, critics see the narrative poems as a \"promise\" of the plays. This critical template, however, puts history backward: Venus and Lucrece become linear promises of an art that does not exist. The critical template also endorses the faulty paradigm underwriting Shakespeare criticism: the poems are the product of a \"man of the theater.\" William Shakespeare was a man of the theater, but he was also a print poet who saw five poems published during his lifetime: Venus (1593), Lucrece (1594), \"The Phoenix and Turtle\" (1601), Sonnets (1609), and A Lover's Complaint (1609). In particular, Venus and Lucrece invaluably record a fiction of their role in Shakespeare's dramatic canon. In turn, the plays record a fiction of the performance of the printed poems. By revising the received wisdom, we may introduce a more accurate map of Shakespeare's literary career. This map preserves the integrity of a developing Shakespeare canon of poems and plays, and it recognizes that the poems gesture to the plays and the plays to the poems. To support this argument, the essay features evidence from Shakespeare's own canon fictions: intratextual moments in the poems and plays that record a narrative about the structure of his career. Yet other evidence emerges: from the narrative poems' genre, minor epic; from a neglected canon topos emerging from antiquity, \"great things and small\"; from the poems' reception history; and from both biography and bibliography. Venus and Lucrece are not simply commercially driven works produced in a youthful moment of dramatic inactivity; they are types of generic form and literary character in a remarkably structured canon on page and stage. As Shakespeare gets ready to retire, he presents his canon in Cymbeline in just this way. In the end, we may view Venus and Lucrece as integral to his dramatic career, at once fountains and foundations for comedy, history, tragedy, and romance.","PeriodicalId":45500,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","volume":"119 1","pages":"405 - 433"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2022.0009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This essay revisits one of the oldest topics of Shakespeare criticism: the relation between Venus and Adonis, The Rape of Lucrece, and the plays. From Charles Gildon forward, critics see the narrative poems as a "promise" of the plays. This critical template, however, puts history backward: Venus and Lucrece become linear promises of an art that does not exist. The critical template also endorses the faulty paradigm underwriting Shakespeare criticism: the poems are the product of a "man of the theater." William Shakespeare was a man of the theater, but he was also a print poet who saw five poems published during his lifetime: Venus (1593), Lucrece (1594), "The Phoenix and Turtle" (1601), Sonnets (1609), and A Lover's Complaint (1609). In particular, Venus and Lucrece invaluably record a fiction of their role in Shakespeare's dramatic canon. In turn, the plays record a fiction of the performance of the printed poems. By revising the received wisdom, we may introduce a more accurate map of Shakespeare's literary career. This map preserves the integrity of a developing Shakespeare canon of poems and plays, and it recognizes that the poems gesture to the plays and the plays to the poems. To support this argument, the essay features evidence from Shakespeare's own canon fictions: intratextual moments in the poems and plays that record a narrative about the structure of his career. Yet other evidence emerges: from the narrative poems' genre, minor epic; from a neglected canon topos emerging from antiquity, "great things and small"; from the poems' reception history; and from both biography and bibliography. Venus and Lucrece are not simply commercially driven works produced in a youthful moment of dramatic inactivity; they are types of generic form and literary character in a remarkably structured canon on page and stage. As Shakespeare gets ready to retire, he presents his canon in Cymbeline in just this way. In the end, we may view Venus and Lucrece as integral to his dramatic career, at once fountains and foundations for comedy, history, tragedy, and romance.
《维纳斯与阿多尼斯:对路克丽丝的强奸》与莎士比亚经典
摘要:本文回顾了莎士比亚评论界最古老的话题之一:维纳斯与阿多尼斯的关系、《强奸卢克蕾斯》以及莎剧。从查尔斯·吉尔登开始,评论家将叙事诗视为戏剧的“承诺”。然而,这种批判的模板将历史向后推:维纳斯和卢克蕾丝成为一种不存在的艺术的线性承诺。批评的模板也支持了支持莎士比亚批评的错误范式:这些诗是“戏剧人”的产物。威廉·莎士比亚是一位戏剧家,但他也是一位印刷诗人,他一生中发表了五首诗:《维纳斯》(1593)、《卢克蕾丝》(1594)、《凤凰与乌龟》(1601)、《十四行诗》(1609)和《情人的抱怨》(1609)。尤其是维纳斯和卢克蕾斯,她们在莎士比亚戏剧经典中所扮演的角色被记录下来。反过来,戏剧记录了印刷诗歌表演的虚构。通过修正这些公认的观点,我们可以更准确地了解莎士比亚的文学生涯。这幅地图保留了莎士比亚诗歌和戏剧的完整发展,它承认诗歌对戏剧的姿态,戏剧对诗歌的姿态。为了支持这一论点,这篇文章从莎士比亚自己的经典小说中找到了证据:诗歌和戏剧中的文本内时刻,记录了他职业生涯结构的叙述。还有其他的证据:从叙事诗的类型来看,小史诗;从一个被忽视的经典主题从古代出现,“大事与小事”;从诗歌的接受史看;从传记和参考书目中。《维纳斯》和《卢克丽丝》并不是单纯的商业驱动的作品,创作于一个戏剧不活跃的年轻时刻;它们是一般形式和文学人物的类型,在一个非常结构化的佳能中出现在页面和舞台上。当莎士比亚准备退休时,他在《辛白林》中以这种方式呈现了他的经典。最后,我们可以把维纳斯和卢克丽丝看作是他戏剧生涯中不可或缺的一部分,既是喜剧、历史、悲剧和浪漫的源泉和基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Studies in Philology addresses scholars in a wide range of disciplines, though traditionally its strength has been English Medieval and Renaissance studies. SIP publishes articles on British literature before 1900 and on relations between British literature and works in the Classical, Romance, and Germanic Languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信