Public acceptance of the use of Far-UVC for virus inactivation: Challenges and opportunities

Abbie Ross , Ewan Eadie , Sally H Ibbotson , Paul O'Mahoney
{"title":"Public acceptance of the use of Far-UVC for virus inactivation: Challenges and opportunities","authors":"Abbie Ross ,&nbsp;Ewan Eadie ,&nbsp;Sally H Ibbotson ,&nbsp;Paul O'Mahoney","doi":"10.1016/j.ipemt.2023.100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>There is an urgent need for technologies which can reduce the impact of airborne disease transmission. Far-UVC (200–230 nm) is a range of wavelengths growing in relevance for airborne virus disinfection in occupied public spaces. These wavelengths quickly and efficiently inactivate airborne pathogens, while to current knowledge remaining low risk to room occupants. If there is ever to be an effective widespread implementation of these technologies in public spaces, it is important to assess public opinion to ensure appropriate use and understanding of the technology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A self-administered survey was distributed through social media channels with several questions to gather opinions on using Far-UVC. The survey was distributed between September 2021 and January 2022. Outcome measures included how safe respondents would feel with or without Far-UVC in indoor spaces and how acceptable the technology would be in certain indoor spaces.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 111 respondents to the survey. The median age range of the respondents was 36–45, most respondents had never studied biology or related science subjects beyond school level (68%, <em>n</em> = 76), and 87% (<em>n</em> = 97) were indoor workers or attended formal education. Less than one-third of respondents had heard of the term ‘Far-UVC’. Though, on learning about the core principles of Far-UVC, respondents became more supportive of its use in public spaces. Acceptance of Far-UVC was strongest in areas where a higher benefit-risk ratio was perceived, such as in hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We have shown that when the basic concepts of Far-UVC are clearly communicated, public opinion on its adoption improves. Without such a general understanding amongst members of the public, Far-UVC may then face challenges in gaining widespread adoption. The assessment of public opinion presented here will help to determine where primary concerns lie, and the actions needed to address these.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73507,"journal":{"name":"IPEM-translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPEM-translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266725882300002X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

There is an urgent need for technologies which can reduce the impact of airborne disease transmission. Far-UVC (200–230 nm) is a range of wavelengths growing in relevance for airborne virus disinfection in occupied public spaces. These wavelengths quickly and efficiently inactivate airborne pathogens, while to current knowledge remaining low risk to room occupants. If there is ever to be an effective widespread implementation of these technologies in public spaces, it is important to assess public opinion to ensure appropriate use and understanding of the technology.

Methods

A self-administered survey was distributed through social media channels with several questions to gather opinions on using Far-UVC. The survey was distributed between September 2021 and January 2022. Outcome measures included how safe respondents would feel with or without Far-UVC in indoor spaces and how acceptable the technology would be in certain indoor spaces.

Results

There were 111 respondents to the survey. The median age range of the respondents was 36–45, most respondents had never studied biology or related science subjects beyond school level (68%, n = 76), and 87% (n = 97) were indoor workers or attended formal education. Less than one-third of respondents had heard of the term ‘Far-UVC’. Though, on learning about the core principles of Far-UVC, respondents became more supportive of its use in public spaces. Acceptance of Far-UVC was strongest in areas where a higher benefit-risk ratio was perceived, such as in hospitals.

Conclusion

We have shown that when the basic concepts of Far-UVC are clearly communicated, public opinion on its adoption improves. Without such a general understanding amongst members of the public, Far-UVC may then face challenges in gaining widespread adoption. The assessment of public opinion presented here will help to determine where primary concerns lie, and the actions needed to address these.

公众接受使用远紫外线灭活病毒:挑战和机遇
目的研究减少空气传播疾病影响的技术是迫切需要的。远紫外线(200 - 230nm)是与占用的公共场所空气传播病毒消毒相关的波长范围。这些波长快速有效地灭活空气传播的病原体,同时据目前所知,对房间居住者的风险仍然很低。如果要在公共场所有效地广泛实施这些技术,就必须评估公众意见,以确保对这些技术的适当使用和理解。方法通过社交媒体进行问卷调查,收集用户对使用远紫外线的意见。该调查于2021年9月至2022年1月进行。结果测量包括受访者在室内空间使用或不使用远紫外线的安全程度,以及该技术在某些室内空间的可接受程度。结果共有111人参与调查。受访者的中位年龄范围为36-45岁,大多数受访者(68%,n = 76)从未学习过生物学或相关科学科目,87% (n = 97)是室内工作者或接受过正规教育。不到三分之一的受访者听说过“远紫外线”这个词。然而,在了解远紫外线的核心原理后,受访者变得更加支持在公共空间使用远紫外线。远紫外线的接受程度最高的领域是那些被认为具有较高风险比的领域,比如医院。结论我们的研究表明,当远紫外线的基本概念被清楚地传达时,公众对其采用的看法就会改善。如果公众对远紫外线没有这样的普遍认识,远紫外线在获得广泛采用方面可能会面临挑战。这里提出的对公众意见的评估将有助于确定主要关注的问题在哪里,以及解决这些问题所需采取的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IPEM-translation
IPEM-translation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
63 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信