A moderated mediation model of smart-device use: work–family conflict and well-being by age

IF 1.6 Q2 Business, Management and Accounting
J. Haar, S. Wilkinson
{"title":"A moderated mediation model of smart-device use: work–family conflict and well-being by age","authors":"J. Haar, S. Wilkinson","doi":"10.1108/ebhrm-01-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSmart device use for work during family time is a growing issue of concern and is likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors test a broad range of well-being outcomes (job anxiety, job depression and insomnia) to extend the literature. Work–family conflict was included as a mediator with age as a moderator.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses representative data from 422 New Zealand employees across a wide range of occupations, sectors, and industries from late 2020. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the data was used and moderated mediation analysis was conducted.FindingsOverall, hypotheses were supported, with mWork positively influencing work–family and family–work conflict, and all well-being outcomes. Work–family and family–work conflict acted as mediators and age interacted with mWork leading to more conflict for older workers. Finally, moderated mediation effects were supported with age acting as a boundary condition, whereby the indirect effect of mWork on well-being outcomes increases as age increases.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings highlight the danger of using mobile devices to work in family time and highlight the additional risks for older workers.Originality/valueThe mWork literature has a limited focus on well-being outcomes, and the New Zealand data provides insights from a largely underrepresented population in the literature. Further, the use of age as a moderator of mWork towards well-being outcomes provides further originality.","PeriodicalId":51902,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based HRM-A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ebhrm-01-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeSmart device use for work during family time is a growing issue of concern and is likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors test a broad range of well-being outcomes (job anxiety, job depression and insomnia) to extend the literature. Work–family conflict was included as a mediator with age as a moderator.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses representative data from 422 New Zealand employees across a wide range of occupations, sectors, and industries from late 2020. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the data was used and moderated mediation analysis was conducted.FindingsOverall, hypotheses were supported, with mWork positively influencing work–family and family–work conflict, and all well-being outcomes. Work–family and family–work conflict acted as mediators and age interacted with mWork leading to more conflict for older workers. Finally, moderated mediation effects were supported with age acting as a boundary condition, whereby the indirect effect of mWork on well-being outcomes increases as age increases.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings highlight the danger of using mobile devices to work in family time and highlight the additional risks for older workers.Originality/valueThe mWork literature has a limited focus on well-being outcomes, and the New Zealand data provides insights from a largely underrepresented population in the literature. Further, the use of age as a moderator of mWork towards well-being outcomes provides further originality.
智能设备使用的适度中介模型:按年龄划分的工作-家庭冲突和幸福感
在家庭时间使用智能设备工作是一个日益受到关注的问题,COVID-19大流行可能会加剧这一问题。作者测试了广泛的幸福感结果(工作焦虑、工作抑郁和失眠)来扩展文献。工作-家庭冲突是一个调解因素,年龄是一个调节因素。该研究使用了从2020年底开始的422名新西兰员工的代表性数据,这些员工来自各种职业、部门和行业。对数据进行验证性因子分析(CFA),并进行有调节的中介分析。总体而言,假设得到支持,mWork积极影响工作-家庭和家庭-工作冲突,以及所有幸福结果。工作-家庭和家庭-工作冲突是调解人,年龄与mWork相互作用,导致年长员工发生更多冲突。最后,年龄作为边界条件支持有调节的中介效应,即mWork对幸福感结果的间接影响随着年龄的增加而增加。研究的局限性/启示研究结果强调了在家庭时间使用移动设备工作的危险,并强调了老年员工的额外风险。mWork文献对幸福结果的关注有限,新西兰的数据提供了文献中大部分未被充分代表的人群的见解。此外,使用年龄作为mWork对幸福感结果的调节因子提供了进一步的独创性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信