Diversified urban housing markets and decentralized market regulation in China

IF 1.5 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Wenjing Li, Zhi Liu
{"title":"Diversified urban housing markets and decentralized market regulation in China","authors":"Wenjing Li, Zhi Liu","doi":"10.1108/ijhma-03-2023-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn 2016, the Chinese central government decentralized the responsibilities of housing market regulation to the municipal level. This paper aims to assess whether the decentralized market regulation is effective.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study first investigates the fundamental drivers of urban housing prices in China. Taking into consideration the factors driving housing prices, the authors further investigate the effectiveness of decentralized housing market regulation by a pre- and post-policy comparison test using a panel data set of 35 major cities for the years from 2014 to 2019.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results reveal heterogenous policy effects on housing price growth among cities with a one-year lag in effectiveness. With the decentralized housing market regulation, cities with fast price growth are incentivized to implement tightening measures, while cities with relatively low housing prices and slow price growth are more likely to do nothing or deregulate the markets. The findings indicate that the shift from a centralized housing market regulation to a decentralized one is more appropriate and effective for the individual cities.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFew policy evaluation studies have been done to examine the effects of decentralized housing market regulation on the performance of urban housing markets in China. The authors devise a methodology to conduct a policy evaluation that is important to inform public policy and decisions. This study helps enhance the understanding of the fundamental factors in China’s urban housing markets and the effectiveness of municipal government interventions.\n","PeriodicalId":14136,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-03-2023-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose In 2016, the Chinese central government decentralized the responsibilities of housing market regulation to the municipal level. This paper aims to assess whether the decentralized market regulation is effective. Design/methodology/approach This study first investigates the fundamental drivers of urban housing prices in China. Taking into consideration the factors driving housing prices, the authors further investigate the effectiveness of decentralized housing market regulation by a pre- and post-policy comparison test using a panel data set of 35 major cities for the years from 2014 to 2019. Findings The results reveal heterogenous policy effects on housing price growth among cities with a one-year lag in effectiveness. With the decentralized housing market regulation, cities with fast price growth are incentivized to implement tightening measures, while cities with relatively low housing prices and slow price growth are more likely to do nothing or deregulate the markets. The findings indicate that the shift from a centralized housing market regulation to a decentralized one is more appropriate and effective for the individual cities. Originality/value Few policy evaluation studies have been done to examine the effects of decentralized housing market regulation on the performance of urban housing markets in China. The authors devise a methodology to conduct a policy evaluation that is important to inform public policy and decisions. This study helps enhance the understanding of the fundamental factors in China’s urban housing markets and the effectiveness of municipal government interventions.
中国城市住房市场多元化与市场监管分散化
目的2016年,中国中央政府将住房市场监管职责下放至市级。本文旨在评估分散的市场监管是否有效。设计/方法/方法本研究首次调查了中国城市房价的基本驱动因素。考虑到推动房价的因素,作者使用2014年至2019年35个主要城市的面板数据集,通过政策前后的比较测试,进一步研究了分散式住房市场调控的有效性。结果揭示了政策对有效性滞后一年的城市房价增长的异质性影响。随着住房市场监管的分散化,价格增长快的城市被激励实施紧缩措施,而房价相对较低、价格增长缓慢的城市更有可能无所作为或放松市场管制。研究结果表明,从集中的住房市场调控向分散的住房市场监管转变对各个城市来说更为合适和有效。原创性/价值很少有政策评估研究来考察分散的住房市场监管对中国城市住房市场表现的影响。作者设计了一种进行政策评估的方法,这对公共政策和决策很重要。本研究有助于加深对中国城市住房市场基本因素和市政府干预有效性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
29.40%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信