T. Cochrane, Vickel Narayan, S. Aiello, Mehrasa Alizadeh, James R. Birt, E. Bone, N. Cowie, Michael A. Cowling, C. Deneen, Paul Goldacre, D. Sinfield, T. Stretton, Tom Worthington
{"title":"Analysing mobile learning designs: A framework for transforming learning post-COVID","authors":"T. Cochrane, Vickel Narayan, S. Aiello, Mehrasa Alizadeh, James R. Birt, E. Bone, N. Cowie, Michael A. Cowling, C. Deneen, Paul Goldacre, D. Sinfield, T. Stretton, Tom Worthington","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile learning is well established in literature and practice, but under-evolved from a rigorous learning design perspective. Activity theory presents a sophisticated way of mapping and understanding learning design, but for mobile learning this does not always translate into change in practice. The reported research addresses this by coupling a mobile learning specific approach to activity theory with a practice-based framework: the design for transformative mobile learning framework mapped to the pedagogy-andragogy-heutagogy continuum matrix (the DTML-PAH Matrix). Seven case studies are analysed using this approach and presented narratively along with framework informed analysis. Findings include that the DTML-PAH Matrix can be used to provide clearer implications and guidance for mobile learning practice, and that the DTML-PAH Matrix can also be guided by the practice over time. Implications for further research and practice are discussed.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nProvide technological and pedagogical scaffolds to students.\nLearning designs should focus upon enabling elements of learner agency and creativity.\nTo develop learning solutions to real world problems utilise a design-based research approach.\nCreate authentic collaborative learning activities and tasks.\nIntegrate mobile learning affordances in the design of the course and curriculum.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7997","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Mobile learning is well established in literature and practice, but under-evolved from a rigorous learning design perspective. Activity theory presents a sophisticated way of mapping and understanding learning design, but for mobile learning this does not always translate into change in practice. The reported research addresses this by coupling a mobile learning specific approach to activity theory with a practice-based framework: the design for transformative mobile learning framework mapped to the pedagogy-andragogy-heutagogy continuum matrix (the DTML-PAH Matrix). Seven case studies are analysed using this approach and presented narratively along with framework informed analysis. Findings include that the DTML-PAH Matrix can be used to provide clearer implications and guidance for mobile learning practice, and that the DTML-PAH Matrix can also be guided by the practice over time. Implications for further research and practice are discussed.
Implications for practice or policy:
Provide technological and pedagogical scaffolds to students.
Learning designs should focus upon enabling elements of learner agency and creativity.
To develop learning solutions to real world problems utilise a design-based research approach.
Create authentic collaborative learning activities and tasks.
Integrate mobile learning affordances in the design of the course and curriculum.